Skip to content

Count general_assistance as TANF unearned income in Minnesota, North Dakota, and Wyoming #9390

Description

@hua7450

Summary

general_assistance (agency cash aid such as general relief, BIA General Assistance, or refugee cash assistance) is not counted by any state TANF program that inherits the federal baseline list gov/hhs/tanf/cash/income/sources/unearned.yaml. A state-by-state audit of the 42 inheriting states found that most either exclude general assistance or count it only after a gap or duplication test, so the baseline should stay as is (see #9382 and #9384).

Three inheriting states name General Assistance as countable in their manuals:

State Rule and evidence
Minnesota (MFIP) Combined Manual 0017.12.03 specifically includes GA, RCA, and cash benefits already issued. Section 0011.21 adds concurrent-assistance and transition rules. Combined Manual 0017.12.03, Minn. Stat. 256P.06
North Dakota The current countable-unearned-income page lists General Assistance. An older edition states that direct county or BIA GA cash counts; vendor, reimbursement, and complementary-assistance exclusions are distinct. Countable unearned income, Disregards
Wyoming (POWER) The SNAP and POWER income table marks General Assistance from state, local, or tribal sources nonexempt with its own income code. SNAP and POWER Policy Manual

Proposed change

For each state, follow the Maine pattern in #9384:

  1. Add a state-specific unearned list (federal baseline plus general_assistance) under the state's TANF parameters, citing the manual above.
  2. Add a state gross-unearned-income variable that adds the list, and point the state's countable-unearned formula at it.
  3. Add a test showing general_assistance counts and a regression case on the existing integration tests.

Concurrent-benefit rules (a GA recipient is usually not TANF-eligible) are not modeled; the change only affects API callers who send general_assistance for an assistance-unit member. It is inert for microsimulation because the CPS dataset never populates the variable.

Out of scope

States whose manuals make general assistance conditional (need-standard gap or duplication tests, for example Nevada, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Washington) or leave it unresolved (Connecticut, Idaho, New York, West Virginia) need formula logic rather than a list entry and are not part of this issue.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions