Problems when trying to run the prospector

[saletybaracho]

Hi, I'm very interested in testing the prospector project on my machine.

I followed the step-by-step guide on how to run the project using Docker and when I try to run the example command "./run_prospector.sh CVE-2020-1925 --repository https://github.com/apache/olingo- odata4" missing LLM error appears.

What should the config.yaml file look like to disable the use of LLM?

Can you help me?

[copernico]

Hi, could you post the exact error message here?

[lauraschauer]

Hi,
You should be able to run Prospector by commenting out the llm_service section in the config.yaml file. It should look like this:

... 
# LLM Usage (check README for help)
# llm_service:
#   type: sap # use "sap" or "third_party"
#   model_name: gpt-4-turbo
#   temperature: 0.0 # optional, default is 0.0
#   ai_core_sk: <file_path> # needed for type: sap

#   use_llm_repository_url: False # whether to use LLM's to obtain the repository URL
...

This bug will be fixed soon, so that specifying use_llm_repository_url: False doesn't create a missing LLM error.

[saletybaracho]

Hi Laura,
I will try again and let you know if it works.
Thanks for the prompt response.

[saletybaracho]

Hi @lauraschauer ,

I commented the lines you recommended and had the error "'use_llm_repository_url' is missing in config.yaml."

The solution for me is:

... 
# LLM Usage (check README for help)
# llm_service:
#   type: sap # use "sap" or "third_party"
#   model_name: gpt-4-turbo
#   temperature: 0.0 # optional, default is 0.0
#   ai_core_sk: <file_path> # needed for type: sap

use_llm_repository_url: False # whether to use LLM's to obtain the repository URL
...

I'm going to start testing Prospector because I'm a PhD student and I think this tool will help me in my research on software vulnerability.
I've been following the project-kb and sap papers since last year. :)

Thanks for the support!

[lauraschauer]

Hi,
Sorry for that mistake! Great you got it to work :)

I've created an issue about this here #389, and it should be resolved soon!

[copernico]

Please see #389