not understandable sevntu check

[Bananeweizen]

In 2 of my PRs I had to disable SimpleAccessorNameNotation. It's raising issues on perfectly valid names which I have checked multiple times. Also the error message and documentation don't really tell anything about how to fix it.
I suggest to completely disable it (which will happen anyway if one of those 2 PRs is merged).

[rnveach]

I would report an issue to sevntu if you think it is a bug in the check.

[Bananeweizen]

I'm not sure. I don't know what it is expecting, even after reading documentation. I have a field mSomething, and a getter getSomething(). Not sure if it's confused by the "m" notation (which I don't like myself, but I try to stay consistent with existing code). If you know the check better, you may want to run one of my PRs and remove the disablement locally to see what happens.

[rnveach]

Not sure if it's confused by the "m" notation

I think this is the issue. My understanding of the check, from just refreshing my memory, is (for example) a pure getter method (method that just returns a field) should be named exactly after the field it returns. It should be expecting getMSomething since there is no option to ignore prefixes.

[Bananeweizen]

In that case I would leave the disablement in my PRs and later check if we can do a mass refactoring of the field names to get rid of the m prefixes and to re-enable the check then.

[rnveach]

@Bananeweizen I apologize, SimpleAccessorNameNotationCheck does have a prefix property. However, I believe it only supports one type of prefix, so if eclipse-cs uses multiple then it won't work.

$ cat TestClass.java
public class TestClass {
    private int mSomething;

    void getSomething() { // line 4
      return mSomething;
    }
}
public class TestClassAlt {
    private int mSomething;

    void getMSomething() { // line 11
      return mSomething;
    }
}

$ cat TestConfig.xml
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE module PUBLIC
          "-//Checkstyle//DTD Checkstyle Configuration 1.3//EN"
          "https://checkstyle.org/dtds/configuration_1_3.dtd">

<module name="Checker">
    <property name="charset" value="UTF-8"/>
    <property name="severity" value="warning"/>
    <property name="haltOnException" value="false"/>

    <module name="TreeWalker">

<module name="com.github.sevntu.checkstyle.checks.coding.SimpleAccessorNameNotationCheck">
  <property name="prefix" value="m" />
</module>

    </module>
</module>

$ java -jar checkstyle-10.4-sevntu-1.44.1-all.jar -c TestConfig.xml TestClass.java
Starting audit...
[WARN] TestClass.java:11:5: Unexpected getter name. [SimpleAccessorNameNotation]
Audit done.

If you do remove prefix property, it does behave as I described before.

$ cat TestClass.java
public class TestClass {
    private int mSomething;

    void getSomething() { // line 4
      return mSomething;
    }
}
public class TestClassAlt {
    private int mSomething;

    void getMSomething() { // line 11
      return mSomething;
    }
}

$ cat TestConfig.xml
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE module PUBLIC
          "-//Checkstyle//DTD Checkstyle Configuration 1.3//EN"
          "https://checkstyle.org/dtds/configuration_1_3.dtd">

<module name="Checker">
    <property name="charset" value="UTF-8"/>
    <property name="severity" value="warning"/>
    <property name="haltOnException" value="false"/>

    <module name="TreeWalker">

<module name="com.github.sevntu.checkstyle.checks.coding.SimpleAccessorNameNotationCheck">
</module>

    </module>
</module>

$ java -jar checkstyle-10.4-sevntu-1.44.1-all.jar -c TestConfig.xml TestClass.java
Starting audit...
[WARN] TestClass.java:4:5: Unexpected getter name. [SimpleAccessorNameNotation]
Audit done.