docs: center ordinary doc content column#718
Open
jddark62 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
jddark62
force-pushed
the
docs/center-doc-content-64
branch
from
31a259d to
59d0cc7
Compare
|
This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has had no recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Claims tscircuit/docs-old#64.
/claim #64
Summary
860pxmax-width after the right table of contents is hidden.docItemcontainers instead of globally squeezing every.col, so generated index pages and other layouts keep their current width behavior.Verification
git diff --check860pxmax-width are present..col:not(.col--3)selector is not used for this fix.Note: the archived
tscircuit/docs-old#64issue is read-only/locked, so I could not post/attemptthere. This PR follows the same live-repo claim pattern used by the current docs-old bounty claims.