Upgrade react-tooltip to 5.29.1 and patch Next.js DoS vulnerabilities

package.json

@@ -16,12 +16,12 @@
   "dependencies": {
     "@headlessui/react": "^1.7.18",
     "gray-matter": "^4.0.3",
-    "next": "14.2.26",
+    "next": "14.2.35",
     "react": "^18",
     "react-dom": "^18",
     "react-ga4": "^2.1.0",
     "react-headless-pagination": "^1.1.5",
-    "react-tooltip": "^5.26.3",
+    "react-tooltip": "^5.29.1",
     "remark": "^15.0.1",
     "remark-html": "^16.0.1"
   },

public/static/json/output.json

@@ -1,37 +1,4 @@
 [
-  {
-    "id": "attestation-based-access-gating",
-    "title": "Attestation-Based Access Gating System",
-    "description": "You can use the AttestationStation to create a generic system that allows developers to gate access to product features depending on the attestations that a user has.",
-    "lang": "en-US",
-    "type": "Draft Project Idea",
-    "authors": [
-      "@smartcontracts (GitHub) @ OP Labs"
-    ],
-    "category": "dev-tooling",
-    "effort": "Medium",
-    "skill-sets": [
-      "Front End Development",
-      "Back End Development",
-      "Full Stack Development",
-      "Smart Contract Development"
-    ],
-    "labels": [
-      "Attestations",
-      "Developer Tooling",
-      "Accessibility/Transparency"
-    ],
-    "contributions": {
-      "contributors": [
-        ""
-      ],
-      "discussion-link": "",
-      "links": [
-        ""
-      ],
-      "execution-status": "not-started"
-    }
-  },
   {
     "id": "attestation-based-app-rating",
     "title": "Attestation-Based Dapp Rating System",
@@ -66,39 +33,6 @@
       "execution-status": "in-progress-open"
     }
   },
-  {
-    "id": "attestation-based-challenger",
-    "title": "Attestation-Based Challenger",
-    "description": "Originally, Optimism considered introducing an attestation-based challenger module as a pathway towards decentralization. Though focus has shifted towards fault proofs, the attestation-based module remains a fascinating and worthwhile concept. Instead of a multisig, this module would utilize a smart contract that verifies EIP-712 signatures. ",
-    "lang": "en-US",
-    "type": "Project Idea",
-    "authors": [
-      "@smartcontracts (GitHub) @ OP Labs"
-    ],
-    "category": "protocol-infra",
-    "effort": "Large",
-    "skill-sets": [
-      "Protocol Development",
-      "Full Stack Development",
-      "Smart Contract Development"
-    ],
-    "labels": [
-      "Attestations",
-      "Chain Infrastructure",
-      "Smart Contracts",
-      "Protocol"
-    ],
-    "contributions": {
-      "contributors": [
-        ""
-      ],
-      "discussion-link": "",
-      "links": [
-        ""
-      ],
-      "execution-status": "not-started"
-    }
-  },
   {
     "id": "attestation-data-duplicator",
     "title": "Attestation Data Duplicator",
@@ -124,13 +58,17 @@
     ],
     "contributions": {
       "contributors": [
-        ""
+        "@aagbotemi (GitHub) @ Duplikaat Team",
+        "@goodness5 (GitHub) @ Duplikaat Team",
+        "@okolievans (GitHub) @ Duplikaat Team",
+        "@olorunfemibabs (GitHub) @ Duplikaat Team",
+        "@dadsec-dev (GitHub) @ Duplikaat Team"
       ],
-      "discussion-link": "",
+      "discussion-link": "https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/ecosystem-contributions/discussions/175",
       "links": [
         ""
       ],
-      "execution-status": "not-started"
+      "execution-status": "in-discussion"
     }
   },
   {
@@ -380,13 +318,13 @@
     ],
     "contributions": {
       "contributors": [
-        ""
+        "https://t.me/mummyhap (Telegram) @ BlockPI Network"
       ],
-      "discussion-link": "",
+      "discussion-link": "https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/ecosystem-contributions/discussions/192",
       "links": [
-        ""
+        "https://github.com/BlockPILabs/aggregator"
       ],
-      "execution-status": "not-started"
+      "execution-status": "in-progress-open"
     }
   },
   {