chore: add enforcement extraction cycle artifact (2026-03-31)

[BrianCLong]

Motivation

• Preserve a raw, unremediated snapshot of the enforcement extraction cycle (PR stack, full CI failure logs, nondeterminism signals, and hand-wavy placeholders) so downstream enforcement/compression can operate on original evidence.

Description

• Add docs/ga/enforcement-extraction-cycle-2026-03-31.yaml which records pr_stack, raw ci_failures (full error outputs), nondeterminism findings, and hand_wavy locations discovered during the extraction run.

Testing

• Executed pnpm lint (failed with ESLint RangeError: maximum call stack size exceeded), ran node scripts/ci/verify-prompt-integrity.ts (failed with missing module scripts/ci/lib/prompt-registry), and performed repository scans (rg) to collect nondeterminism and placeholder evidence; results and raw failure logs are included in the artifact.

---

Codex Task

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new enforcement extraction cycle artifact documenting CI failures, non-deterministic code patterns, and incomplete validation logic across the repository. A review comment identifies an inconsistency in the metadata where the file path listed does not match the actual location of the newly added YAML file.

[gemini-code-assist]

The file path listed in the files metadata does not match the actual location of the file being added. The file is located at docs/ga/enforcement-extraction-cycle-2026-03-31.yaml, but the entry here points to artifacts/. This inconsistency should be corrected to ensure downstream tools can correctly locate the artifact.

      - "docs/ga/enforcement-extraction-cycle-2026-03-31.yaml"

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@BrianCLong has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 10 minutes and 41 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0db6133c-5a63-4617-9eaf-9ff46c19e9e4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12cad4a and 9a5f4c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/ga/enforcement-extraction-cycle-2026-03-31.yaml

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codex/run-enforcement-extraction-cycle

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9a5f4c4c6b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Fix PR stack file path to committed artifact

pr_stack[0].files points to artifacts/enforcement-extraction-cycle-2026-03-31.yaml, but this commit adds the artifact at docs/ga/enforcement-extraction-cycle-2026-03-31.yaml and the referenced artifacts/... path does not exist. Any downstream step that reads the listed files from pr_stack will fail to resolve this evidence file, which defeats the purpose of preserving a usable extraction snapshot.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[BrianCLong]

Closed as operational artifact noise. Golden-path enforcement work is tracked on #22309, not on one-off extraction artifacts.