Skip to content

docs: add CAC Procurement and Audit Standard v1.0#23619

Open
BrianCLong wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/create-cac-procurement-and-audit-standard
Open

docs: add CAC Procurement and Audit Standard v1.0#23619
BrianCLong wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/create-cac-procurement-and-audit-standard

Conversation

@BrianCLong
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Motivation

  • Provide a formal, enforceable standard (CAC v1.0) that converts existing CAC enforcement/verification infrastructure into procurement-, audit-, and regulatory-grade requirements.
  • Create an RFP-ready adoption surface so buyers can require verifiable admissibility artifacts (CACert, evidence bundles, traces, transparency proofs) from vendors.

Description

  • Add a new control document at docs/standards/CAC_Procurement_Audit_Standard_v1.0.md containing the five required sections: RFC-style STANDARD, PROCUREMENT LANGUAGE (RFP clauses), AUDIT FRAMEWORK, COMPLIANCE MAPPING, and ADOPTION STRATEGY.
  • Define normative MUST/SHOULD/MAY requirements covering Evidence Bundles, Decision Traces, binary Admissibility Verdicts, signed CACert schema/constraints, verification tooling requirements (API + CLI), and Merkle-based transparency log obligations.
  • Provide 15 enforceable, testable RFP clauses, a repeatable third-party audit checklist with objective pass/fail criteria, and explicit mappings to NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, SOC 2, and the EU AI Act.
  • Include a phased adoption plan (0–90, 90–180, 180+ days) with procurement and audit enforcement mechanics to drive market conditioning.

Testing

  • Ran prettier --check which initially reported formatting issues and then fixed the file with prettier --write.
  • Re-ran prettier --check and confirmed the new document matches repository code style.
  • No runtime code changes were made; change is documentation-only and carries low technical risk.

Codex Task

@BrianCLong BrianCLong added the codex Codex-owned implementation work label Apr 8, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@BrianCLong has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 5 minutes and 41 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 1d3886eb-1571-45a0-b0f8-2ddc68db08a4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff4ddf6 and c216932.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/standards/CAC_Procurement_Audit_Standard_v1.0.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/create-cac-procurement-and-audit-standard

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

codex Codex-owned implementation work requires-serial risk:high

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant