fix: resolve workflow conflicts and enforce MARL type primitives

[BrianCLong]

This PR resolves merge conflicts for the feat-marl-primitives branch, notably fixing massive .github/workflows conflicts by accepting main's versions and cleanly regenerating pnpm-lock.yaml.

Additionally, type safety has been strictly enforced for MARL primitives by replacing any/unknown payloads with proper TypeScript generic parameters in PolicyNetwork and CommunicationChannel.

New unit tests have been implemented covering edge cases in CommunicationChannel, CoordinationProtocol, EmergentBehaviorDetector, and ReplayBuffer. All local tests compile and pass.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 9966537394418735409 started by @BrianCLong

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[gemini-code-assist]

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: edd376d7-d990-4380-b20a-62514d9604d1

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch feat-marl-primitives-12768205828576986636-9966537394418735409

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 19d7de852b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Remove mutually exclusive pull_request path filters

The pull_request trigger now defines both paths and paths-ignore, which are mutually exclusive for the same event in GitHub Actions. With paths: ["**"] added here while paths-ignore remains below, the primary CI workflow can fail trigger validation for PR events, effectively disabling or destabilizing the required CI Core gate for pull requests until one of these filters is removed.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.