Issue template

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+name: 🐛 Bug Report
+description: Report a bug or unexpected behavior
+title: "[Bug]: "
+labels: ["bug", "triage"]
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        Thank you for taking the time to report this bug!
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: description
+    attributes:
+      label: Bug Description
+      description: A clear and concise description of the problem
+      placeholder: What is not working as expected?
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: reproduction
+    attributes:
+      label: Steps to Reproduce
+      description: How to reproduce the behavior
+      placeholder: |
+        1. Set up service with configuration '...'
+        2. Execute HTTP request '...'
+        3. Observe behavior '...'
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: expected
+    attributes:
+      label: Expected Behavior
+      description: What did you expect to happen?
+      placeholder: The service should...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: actual
+    attributes:
+      label: Actual Behavior
+      description: What happened instead?
+      placeholder: The service instead...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: logs
+    attributes:
+      label: Logs and Stack Trace
+      description: If available, paste logs, stack traces or error messages
+      render: shell
+      placeholder: |
+        Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "String.length()" because "user.name" is null
+        at com.example.service.UserService.validateUser(UserService.java:45)
+        at com.example.controller.AuthController.login(AuthController.java:28)....
+
+  - type: input
+    id: version
+    attributes:
+      label: Version
+      description: Which version are you using?
+      placeholder: v1.0.1 or commit hash
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: additional
+    attributes:
+      label: Additional Context
+      description: Screenshots, diagrams, or other useful information
+      placeholder: Any other relevant information...

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+blank_issues_enabled: false
+contact_links:
+  - name: 💬 Discussions
+    url: https://github.com/CIRPASS-2/mock-eu-registry/discussions
+    about: For general questions, support and discussions

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+name: ✨ Feature Request
+description: Propose a new feature or enhancement
+title: "[Feature]: "
+labels: ["enhancement", "feature-request"]
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        Thank you for contributing new ideas to the dpp validator!
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: problem
+    attributes:
+      label: Problem to Solve
+      description: What problem would this feature solve?
+      placeholder: "It's currently difficult/impossible to do X because..."
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: solution
+    attributes:
+      label: Proposed Solution
+      description: How would you like this feature to work?
+      placeholder: |
+        The feature should allow...
+        The user could...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: priority
+    attributes:
+      label: Priority
+      description: How important is this feature to you?
+      options:
+        - High (blocking for my use case)
+        - Medium (would significantly improve workflow)
+        - Low (nice to have)
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: usecase
+    attributes:
+      label: Use Case
+      description: Describe the concrete use case
+      placeholder: |
+        As a user, I would like to...
+        So that...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: technical
+    attributes:
+      label: Technical Notes (optional)
+      description: Technical considerations, API suggestions, architecture
+      placeholder: |
+        Could be implemented via...
+        Would require changes to...
+      render: markdown
+    validations:
+      required: false

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/improvement.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+name: 🔧 Improvement
+description: Propose an improvement to existing functionality
+title: "[Improvement]: "
+labels: ["enhancement", "improvement"]
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        Thank you for helping us improve the dpp validator!
+
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: area
+    attributes:
+      label: Improvement Area
+      description: Which aspect do you want to improve?
+      options:
+        - Performance
+        - Code / Refactoring
+        - Documentation
+        - Testing
+        - Developer Experience
+        - User Experience
+        - Security
+        - Configuration / Deployment
+        - Logging / Monitoring
+        - Other
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: current
+    attributes:
+      label: Current Situation
+      description: How does it work now and what can be improved?
+      placeholder: |
+        Currently component X...
+        This causes issues with...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: proposed
+    attributes:
+      label: Proposed Improvement
+      description: What would you like to change/improve?
+      placeholder: |
+        I propose to modify...
+        This would improve...
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: benefits
+    attributes:
+      label: Benefits
+      description: What are the advantages of this improvement?
+      placeholder: |
+        - Performance: 30% reduction in response time
+        - Maintainability: more readable code
+        - Developer Experience: simpler setup
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: dropdown
+    id: impact
+    attributes:
+      label: Impact
+      description: How invasive is this change?
+      options:
+        - No breaking changes (internal improvements only)
+        - Minor breaking change (easy to migrate)
+        - Significant breaking change (requires refactoring)
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: technical
+    attributes:
+      label: Technical Details
+      description: Technical approach, libraries to use, necessary changes
+      placeholder: |
+        - Replace library X with Y
+        - Implement caching with Redis
+        - Refactor module Z
+    validations:
+      required: false
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: additional
+    attributes:
+      label: Additional Information
+      description: Links, references, code examples
+      placeholder: |
+        References:
+        - https://...
+        - Similar to what was done in project X

README.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ A service for validating Digital Product Passport (DPP) payloads in JSON or JSON
 
 © CIRPASS-2 Consortium, 2024-2027
 
-<img width="832" height="128" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7ad1fa77-65f3-4379-909d-614f64587d40" />
+<img width="832" height="128" alt="image" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CIRPASS-2/assets/main/images/cc-commons.png" />
 
 The CIRPASS-2 project receives funding under the European Union's DIGITAL EUROPE PROGRAMME under the GA No 101158775.