chore(go sdk upgrade): Upgrading go sdk to v1.63.0#4833
Conversation
PranjalC100
added
execute-perf-test
github-actions
Bot
added
the
remind-reviewers
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request performs a routine maintenance update of the project's Go dependencies. By bumping these packages to their latest versions, the repository ensures access to the latest features, performance improvements, and security patches provided by the upstream maintainers. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates various Go dependencies in go.mod and go.sum to their latest versions, including upgrades to Google Cloud client libraries, OpenTelemetry exporters, and several golang.org/x packages. I have no feedback to provide on these changes.
|
FYI: @abhishek10004, This would require more changes in code either in same PR or different for the read checksum changes in SDK. |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4833 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.65% 83.69% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 168 170 +2
Lines 20868 20948 +80
==========================================
+ Hits 17457 17533 +76
Misses 2760 2760
- Partials 651 655 +4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Hi @kislaykishore, @meet2mky, @abhishek10004, your feedback is needed to move this pull request forward. This automated reminder was triggered because there has been no activity for over 24 hours. Please provide your input when you have a moment. Thank you! |
4 similar comments
|
Hi @kislaykishore, @meet2mky, @abhishek10004, your feedback is needed to move this pull request forward. This automated reminder was triggered because there has been no activity for over 24 hours. Please provide your input when you have a moment. Thank you! |
|
Hi @kislaykishore, @meet2mky, @abhishek10004, your feedback is needed to move this pull request forward. This automated reminder was triggered because there has been no activity for over 24 hours. Please provide your input when you have a moment. Thank you! |
|
Hi @kislaykishore, @meet2mky, @abhishek10004, your feedback is needed to move this pull request forward. This automated reminder was triggered because there has been no activity for over 24 hours. Please provide your input when you have a moment. Thank you! |
|
Hi @kislaykishore, @meet2mky, @abhishek10004, your feedback is needed to move this pull request forward. This automated reminder was triggered because there has been no activity for over 24 hours. Please provide your input when you have a moment. Thank you! |
meet2mky
left a comment
meet2mky
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This would require read checksum disablement.
FYI @abhishek10004
|
Hi @kislaykishore, @abhishek10004, @meet2mky, your feedback is needed to move this pull request forward. This automated reminder was triggered because there has been no activity for over 24 hours. Please provide your input when you have a moment. Thank you! |
5 similar comments
|
Hi @kislaykishore, @abhishek10004, @meet2mky, your feedback is needed to move this pull request forward. This automated reminder was triggered because there has been no activity for over 24 hours. Please provide your input when you have a moment. Thank you! |
|
Hi @kislaykishore, @abhishek10004, @meet2mky, your feedback is needed to move this pull request forward. This automated reminder was triggered because there has been no activity for over 24 hours. Please provide your input when you have a moment. Thank you! |
|
Hi @kislaykishore, @abhishek10004, @meet2mky, your feedback is needed to move this pull request forward. This automated reminder was triggered because there has been no activity for over 24 hours. Please provide your input when you have a moment. Thank you! |
|
Hi @kislaykishore, @abhishek10004, @meet2mky, your feedback is needed to move this pull request forward. This automated reminder was triggered because there has been no activity for over 24 hours. Please provide your input when you have a moment. Thank you! |
|
Hi @kislaykishore, @abhishek10004, @meet2mky, your feedback is needed to move this pull request forward. This automated reminder was triggered because there has been no activity for over 24 hours. Please provide your input when you have a moment. Thank you! |
2 participants
Description
storage.WithDisableReaderChecksum()for range reads andstorage.WithDisableMRDReadChecksum()for multi-range downloads.Link to the issue in case of a bug fix.
http://buganizer.corp.google.com/issues/530057360
Testing details
Any backward incompatible change? If so, please explain.