chore: run tests with Java 25

[SirYwell]

We are currently not running tests using Java 25. Let's change that.

[seintur]

Hi,

It seems that JDT with compliance level 25 parses FooCasper strangely. Maybe the 4 slash symbols at line 5 of FooCasper.java are confused with a javadoc markdown comment?

Anyway, since this is not the main focus of the PR, I guess that we can live with a regular // line comment on line 5.

The following patch makes LinesTest.testCompileWhenUsingLinesArgument pass.

--- a/src/test/java/spoon/test/prettyprinter/testclasses/FooCasper.java	(revision f77e0ad8f92be6bbf9b667a32296209d0f1478a9)
+++ b/src/test/java/spoon/test/prettyprinter/testclasses/FooCasper.java	(date 1774625574058)
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 public class FooCasper {
     //	public static void main(String[] args) {
-////		new FooCasper().selfTest();
+//		new FooCasper().selfTest();
 //	}
     FooCasper f;

[I-Al-Istannen]

Sounds fine to paper over it for now, I think

[SirYwell]

Hi,

It seems that JDT with compliance level 25 parses FooCasper strangely. Maybe the 4 slash symbols at line 5 of FooCasper.java are confused with a javadoc markdown comment?

Anyway, since this is not the main focus of the PR, I guess that we can live with a regular // line comment on line 5.

The following patch makes LinesTest.testCompileWhenUsingLinesArgument pass.

--- a/src/test/java/spoon/test/prettyprinter/testclasses/FooCasper.java	(revision f77e0ad8f92be6bbf9b667a32296209d0f1478a9)
+++ b/src/test/java/spoon/test/prettyprinter/testclasses/FooCasper.java	(date 1774625574058)
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 public class FooCasper {
     //	public static void main(String[] args) {
-////		new FooCasper().selfTest();
+//		new FooCasper().selfTest();
 //	}
     FooCasper f;

The problem is indeed that //// ... is a markdown comment, but we currently recognize it as a javadoc comment, and therefore print it incorrectly. @MartinWitt was looking into markdown comment support, depending on his progress it might make sense to just wait, otherwise we can adjust the test though.

[SirYwell]

@I-Al-Istannen I heard you enjoy working with JBang, it looks like it doesn't properly resolve the dependencies? Do you know what's wrong?