Skip to content

Fixed typo#20

Open
EgoVeroConsisto wants to merge 1 commit into
Jamie-Stirling:mainfrom
EgoVeroConsisto:main
Open

Fixed typo#20
EgoVeroConsisto wants to merge 1 commit into
Jamie-Stirling:mainfrom
EgoVeroConsisto:main

Conversation

@EgoVeroConsisto
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Title: Fix Comment Regarding Potential NaN in SimpleRetention

Description:

Hello,

While going through the SimpleRetention class in the module, I noticed a comment in the _get_D method that seemed to have a minor inconsistency. The comment in question mentions:

# this results in some NaN when n is much larger than m

However, after analyzing the matrix operations, it appears that potential NaN values might arise when ( m ) (row index) is much larger than ( n ) (column index), specifically in the bottom-left triangle of the matrix.

This PR corrects the comment to:

# this results in some NaN when m is much larger than n

Such a change might seem minor, but it aids in clarity and correctness for any developer reading the code in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant