[SMApp] Reimplementing the thick shell element of 4 nodes#14284
Open
AlejandroCornejo wants to merge 108 commits intomasterfrom
Open
[SMApp] Reimplementing the thick shell element of 4 nodes#14284AlejandroCornejo wants to merge 108 commits intomasterfrom
AlejandroCornejo wants to merge 108 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@RiccardoRossi @rickyaristio @singerTUM I have finished the implementation and validation of the 4 noded MITC thick shell and the laminate composite CL for shells. An old test of the shell has been updated and another one has been added to test the composite thickness integration CL. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📝 Description
This PR adds a new reimplementation of the old "ShellThickElement3D4N", now named:
MITCThickShellElement3D4NandMITCThickShellCorotationalElement3D4N.These new shells substitute the older ones -> @rickyaristio @rolandwuechner @RiccardoRossi @matekelemen so it WILL break the old cases. These new shells are fully compatible with all the constitutive laws present in the
ConstitutiveLawsApp.In order to update the cases:
For elasticity you may use the
ReissnerMindlinShellElasticConstitutiveLawor theThicknessIntegratedIsotropicConstitutiveLawfor nonlinear ones (e.g. damage, plasticity).I have updated a few tests but I am working on it right now. Since a few changes/improvements have been done to the old shell, we may expect noticeable differences of the results. IMO all changes have been done to improve its performance, especially in the nonlinear cases with plasticity (the result was horrible before).
Beside the developments described above:
I have added a new composite stacking shell constitutive law for modelling laminate composites together with the new thick shells.
These can be used by:
{ "properties" : [{ "model_part_name" : "Structure.shell", "properties_id" : 1, "Material" : { "constitutive_law" : { "name" : "ThicknessIntegratedCompositeConstitutiveLaw", "z_layer_coordinate_vector" : [-0.045, 0.0, 0.045], // z of thecentroid w.r.t middle of the section "Euler_angle_layer_vector" : [0.0, 0.0, 0.0], // rotation along the local Z axis (positive counter clock) "thickness_layer_vector" : [0.01, 0.08, 0.01] // thickness of each layer }, "Variables" : { "THICKNESS" : 0.1, // good for verification "DENSITY" : 7850.0 // TODO we can compute this internally } }, "sub_properties" : [ // subprop start { "properties_id" : 11, "Material" : { "constitutive_law" : { "name" : "GenericAnisotropicPlaneStress2DLaw" }, "Variables" : { "ORTHOTROPIC_ELASTIC_CONSTANTS" : [3.4156e9, 1.7931e9, 3.4156e9, 0.44, 0.0, 0.0], "SHEAR_MODULUS_XY" : 1.0e9, "SHEAR_MODULUS_YZ" : 1.015e9, "SHEAR_MODULUS_XZ" : 0.608e9, "EULER_ANGLES" : [0.0,0.0,0.0], "ISOTROPIC_ANISOTROPIC_YIELD_RATIO" : [1,1,1,1,1,1] }, "Tables" : {} }, "sub_properties" : [{ "properties_id" : 111, "Material" : { "constitutive_law" : { "name" : "LinearElasticPlaneStress2DLaw" }, "Variables" : { "DENSITY" : 2400.0, "YOUNG_MODULUS" : 1e6, "POISSON_RATIO" : 0.3 } } }] } // , { "properties_id" : 12, "Material" : { "constitutive_law" : { "name" : "GenericAnisotropicPlaneStress2DLaw" }, "Variables" : { "ORTHOTROPIC_ELASTIC_CONSTANTS" : [3.4156e8, 1.7931e8, 3.4156e8, 0.44, 0.0, 0.0], "SHEAR_MODULUS_XY" : 1.0e8, "SHEAR_MODULUS_YZ" : 1.015e8, "SHEAR_MODULUS_XZ" : 0.608e8, "EULER_ANGLES" : [0.0,0.0,0.0], "ISOTROPIC_ANISOTROPIC_YIELD_RATIO" : [1,1,1,1,1,1] } }, "sub_properties" : [{ "properties_id" : 121, "Material" : { "constitutive_law" : { "name" : "LinearElasticPlaneStress2DLaw" }, "Variables" : { "DENSITY" : 2400.0, "YOUNG_MODULUS" : 1e6, "POISSON_RATIO" : 0.0 } } }] } // , { "properties_id" : 13, "Material" : { "constitutive_law" : { "name" : "GenericAnisotropicPlaneStress2DLaw" }, "Variables" : { "ORTHOTROPIC_ELASTIC_CONSTANTS" : [3.4156e9, 1.7931e9, 3.4156e9, 0.44, 0.0, 0.0], "SHEAR_MODULUS_XY" : 1.0e9, "SHEAR_MODULUS_YZ" : 1.015e9, "SHEAR_MODULUS_XZ" : 0.608e9, "EULER_ANGLES" : [0.0,0.0,0.0], "ISOTROPIC_ANISOTROPIC_YIELD_RATIO" : [1,1,1,1,1,1] } }, "sub_properties" : [{ "properties_id" : 131, "Material" : { "constitutive_law" : { "name" : "LinearElasticPlaneStress2DLaw" }, "Variables" : { "DENSITY" : 2400.0, "YOUNG_MODULUS" : 1e6, "POISSON_RATIO" : 0.3 } } }] } // ] // end subprops }] } ~~