Conversation
7ef2024 to
7839ca9
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1092 +/- ##
========================================
- Coverage 12% 11% -0%
========================================
Files 266 275 +9
Lines 7201 7347 +146
========================================
+ Hits 803 806 +3
- Misses 6398 6541 +143 |
417c250 to
bd61b50
Compare
7839ca9 to
218b55e
Compare
LuisDuarte1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you add "group" feature flags? For instance, the feature flag new-redesign will activate/deactivate many feature flags like: courses-page, and schedule-page. To make feature flags easier to interact with.
751733d to
73be404
Compare
73be404 to
2c52f36
Compare
2164944 to
007bbe3
Compare
007bbe3 to
07a3d04
Compare
07a3d04 to
706db83
Compare
limwa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since we're now turning towards a more testable approach to uni, do you think you can remove the static modifier from the methods and use Provider.value() to deliver the FeatureFlagsController to wherever it is needed?
706db83 to
b4b0703
Compare
Pull request was converted to draft
Closes #872
I included some example flags to clarify the normal use-case, they should be removed later when real feature flags are to be included
Workflow
featureFlagTablefeatureFlagController.getFeatureFlag(<code>)and save it in a static field (if you receive the errorNull check operator used on a null value, it probably means the feature flag code is mismatched)ExperimentalFeatureWrapper, and associate the latter to the feature flagReview checklist
whatsnew/whatsnew-pt-PTchangelog.mdwith the change