refactor!: Remove to_polars_schema method - #387
Merged
Conversation
Oliver Borchert (borchero)
requested review from
Andreas Albert (AndreasAlbertQC) and
Daniel Elsner (delsner)
as code owners
July 30, 2026 17:21
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## remove-pyarrow #387 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
================================================
Files 56 56
Lines 3416 3413 -3
================================================
- Hits 3416 3413 -3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Oliver Borchert (borchero)
changed the base branch from
pycapsuel
to
remove-pyarrow
July 30, 2026 19:21
Andreas Albert (AndreasAlbertQC)
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
With #385, we don't need the explicit conversion method anymore. For consistency with pyarrow, users would now do
pl.Schema(MySchema)instead ofMySchema.to_polars_schema().