Independent security review: source audit + on-chain state verification - #48
Open
utkutugrul wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Independent security review: source audit + on-chain state verification#48utkutugrul wants to merge 4 commits into
utkutugrul wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
Fourth-pass review (after 2 Cantina + 1 Spearbit) covering full toolchain re-verification, stateful fuzzing (Echidna + Medusa), symbolic execution (Halmos, substituting for an unmaintainable Manticore), and a fresh look at the faucets and deployment scripts that fell outside prior scope. No Critical/High/Medium findings. All prior audit fixes independently verified in place. 100% test coverage confirmed on every in-scope contract.
…chain.md Smoke-tested: bash -n clean, shellcheck clean, full run 95 pass / 0 fail / 2 known-finding warnings, exit code reflects pass/fail.
…ng rationale Every PASS line now prints the on-chain value that satisfied it (address, role member, boolean), not just the check label. Also expanded the header comment to spell out why this script exists: catching front-run initialization / role grabs on the CREATE2/CREATE3 + separate-initializer deploy pattern, not just formatting drift. Re-smoke-tested: bash -n clean, shellcheck clean, 95 pass / 0 fail / 2 known-finding warnings, exit code 0.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fourth-pass independent security review (after 2 Cantina + 1 Spearbit), plus a companion on-chain state verification.
audit/audit.md— source-code review: full toolchain re-verification (Slither, Semgrep, Echidna, Medusa, Halmos), stateful fuzzing, and a fresh look at the faucets and deployment scripts. No Critical/High/Medium findings; all prior audit fixes independently confirmed in place.audit/audit-2-onchain.md— on-chain verification that the live deployed contracts (mainnet: Ethereum/Base/Polygon; testnet: ETH Sepolia/Base Sepolia, Aug 18 2026 deployment) actually match what the source and deploy scripts intend: roles, ownership, proxy implementations, cross-contract wiring, bytecode consistency. One Low finding (LegacyTelcoinFauceton testnet still owned by a stale, unrelated Safe instead of the current governance Safe) and one informational item (apparent same-address/different-bytecode cases across chains, byte-diffed and traced to legitimate per-chain immutables, not a backdoor).Test plan
audit-2-onchain.md§3.1 (stale faucet owner)