Add 2 properties to OcelotPipelineConfiguration class for more flexibility in pipeline#1497
Open
ArsalanMoniee wants to merge 8 commits intoThreeMammals:developfrom
Conversation
stefancruz
added a commit
to stefancruz/Ocelot
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2022
…into develop Cherry picked from ThreeMammals#1497
raman-m
force-pushed
the
feature/add-feature-for-ocelot-pipeline-configuration
branch
from
5effa06 to
3560bb9
Compare
raman-m
changed the title
Member
|
The feature branch has been rebased onto ThreeMammals:develop! @ArsalanMoniee |
raman-m
added
feature
raman-m
requested review from
RaynaldM,
abooraja,
anktsrkr,
binarymash,
geffzhang,
jps,
philproctor,
sharpn,
thiagoloureiro,
wast and
yangzhongke
RaynaldM
previously approved these changes
Aug 28, 2023
Contributor
RaynaldM
left a comment
RaynaldM
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you correct you PR title :
claas => class
pipieeline => pipeline
raman-m
changed the title
Member
raman-m
changed the title
OcelotPipelineConfiguration class for more flexibility in pipeline
raman-m
force-pushed
the
feature/add-feature-for-ocelot-pipeline-configuration
branch
from
2a8f3dc to
2c7ded4
Compare
…operty to OcelotPipelineConfiguration claas for more flexibility in pipieline
… characters: should_*
…l prevent derived types that introduce a finalizer from needing to re-implement 'IDisposable' to call it.
raman-m
force-pushed
the
feature/add-feature-for-ocelot-pipeline-configuration
branch
from
0b704a9 to
f8662f4
Compare
raman-m
force-pushed
the
develop
branch
14 times, most recently
from
c216cdf to
b458f0f
Compare
raman-m
force-pushed
the
develop
branch
4 times, most recently
from
af33cc2 to
e5b3751
Compare
Collaborator
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes / New Feature
In a recent project, I needed to use existing and custom Authorization side by side. In the current situation, using custom Authorization before the original Authorization would reduce performance. Because in my custom Authorization service, it was necessary to call a specific web API.
Calling that web API before authentication would create a load for routes which were not existed in upstream. (ocelot json)
as well as the web API only call for valid request!
Proposed Changes
OcelotPipelineConfigurationclass for more flexibility in Ocelot's pipeline