Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
26 changes: 21 additions & 5 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -84,11 +84,27 @@ The machine-generated texts are edited by an in-house team of annotators, who ar
## Cite us

```
@article{artemova2024beemo,
title={Beemo: Benchmark of Expert-edited Machine-generated Outputs},
author={Artemova, Ekaterina and Lucas, Jason and Venkatraman, Saranya and Lee, Jooyoung and Tilga, Sergei and Uchendu, Adaku and Mikhailov, Vladislav},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04032},
year={2024}
@inproceedings{artemova-etal-2025-beemo,
title = "Beemo: Benchmark of Expert-edited Machine-generated Outputs",
author = "Artemova, Ekaterina and
Lucas, Jason S and
Venkatraman, Saranya and
Lee, Jooyoung and
Tilga, Sergei and
Uchendu, Adaku and
Mikhailov, Vladislav",
editor = "Chiruzzo, Luis and
Ritter, Alan and
Wang, Lu",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = apr,
year = "2025",
address = "Albuquerque, New Mexico",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-long.357/",
pages = "6992--7018",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-189-6",
abstract = "The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has increased the volume of machine-generated texts (MGTs) and blurred text authorship in various domains. However, most existing MGT benchmarks include single-author texts (human-written and machine-generated). This conventional design fails to capture more practical multi-author scenarios, where the user refines the LLM response for natural flow, coherence, and factual correctness. Our paper introduces the Benchmark of Expert-edited Machine-generated Outputs (Beemo), which includes 6.5k texts written by humans, generated by ten instruction-finetuned LLMs, and edited by experts for various use cases, ranging from creative writing to summarization. Beemo additionally comprises 13.1k machine-generated and LLM-edited texts, allowing for diverse MGT detection evaluation across various edit types. We document Beemo`s creation protocol and present the results of benchmarking 33 configurations of MGT detectors in different experimental setups. We find that expert-based editing evades MGT detection, while LLM-edited texts are unlikely to be recognized as human-written. Beemo and all materials are publicly available."
}
```

Expand Down