perf(core/vm): hoist jumptable nil-check out of the interpreter loop #32068#2318
perf(core/vm): hoist jumptable nil-check out of the interpreter loop #32068#2318gzliudan wants to merge 1 commit intoXinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
Conversation
…thereum#32068 Refactor the EVM interpreter to clarify and optimize jump table access. This improves code readability and may slightly enhance performance. No logic is changed.
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Optimizes the EVM interpreter’s hot loop in core/vm by caching the jump table pointer locally and forcing the jump table nil-check to occur once before entering the opcode dispatch loop, aiming for slightly improved performance and clearer jump table access.
Changes:
- Cache
evm.tableinto a localjumpTablevariable used for opcode dispatch. - Hoist the jump table nil-check out of the interpreter loop via a single pre-loop array access.
- Replace per-iteration
evm.table[op]access withjumpTable[op].
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Proposed changes
Refactor the EVM interpreter to clarify and optimize jump table access. This improves code readability and may slightly enhance performance. No logic is changed.
Ref: ethereum#32068
Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an
✅in the boxes that applyImpacted Components
Which parts of the codebase does this PR touch?
Put an
✅in the boxes that applyChecklist
Put an
✅in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that