Fix BIP3 link in BIP360, touch up BIP3 reference in BIP347#2148
Merged
jonatack merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom Apr 24, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Both BIPs added a changelog entry on 2026-01-23 referencing the updated BIP Process meta-BIP with the wrong form: - bip-0360.mediawiki:404 rendered `[[bip-0003.mediawiki|BIP 003]]`, but the actual file is `bip-0003.md`. The MediaWiki link therefore failed to resolve to the BIP 3 page on the bitcoin/bips GitHub wiki render and on the bips.dev / bip339 style mirrors — readers of the bip-0360 changelog landed on a 404. - bip-0347.mediawiki:170 wrote the same reference as bare text `BIP 003` with no link at all, so readers of bip-0347 had no way to navigate to the BIP 3 they were meant to follow. Rewrite both entries to use the canonical form `[[bip-0003.md|BIP 3]]`: - `bip-0003.md` matches the actual filename. - `BIP 3` matches the display text convention the README (line 40) and every other BIP in this repository already use when linking to bip-0003 — "BIP 003" with the three-digit zero-pad appears nowhere else in the repo for any BIP and is not part of the display style described in BIP 2. Also drops the trailing whitespace on the bip-0347 line while we are there (the `typos` CI tolerates it but it is inconsistent with every other line in the same changelog block).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two BIPs added a changelog entry on 2026-01-23 referencing the updated BIP Process meta-BIP (BIP 3) with the wrong form:
[[bip-0003.mediawiki|BIP 003]], but the actual file in this repository isbip-0003.md(no MediaWiki variant exists). The wiki link therefore fails to resolve — readers of the bip-0360 changelog landed on a 404.BIP 003with no link at all, so readers of bip-0347 had no way to navigate to BIP 3.Both entries were added on the same day (2026-01-23) with the same mistaken "BIP 003" (three-digit zero-pad) display text.
Fix
Rewrite both entries to use the canonical form
[[bip-0003.md|BIP 3]]:bip-0003.mdmatches the actual filename.BIP 3matches the display text convention the README already uses at line 40 ([[bip-0003.md|3]]). "BIP 003" with the three-digit zero-pad appears nowhere else in this repository for any BIP.Verification
ls bip-0003.*→bip-0003.md+bip-0003/(image asset directory). Nobip-0003.mediawikifile exists.bip-XXXX.{mediawiki,md}filename references across every.mediawiki/.mdfile in the repository;bip-0003.mediawikiwas the only one that does not resolve to an existing file.bip-0003.md, establishing the correct form.