Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions content/docs/configuration/acme/dns01/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ Links to these supported providers along with their documentation are below:
- [`AliDNS-Webhook`](https://github.com/pragkent/alidns-webhook)
- [`bizflycloud-certmanager-dns-webhook`](https://github.com/bizflycloud/bizflycloud-certmanager-dns-webhook)
- [`cert-manager-alidns-webhook`](https://github.com/DEVmachine-fr/cert-manager-alidns-webhook)
- [`cert-manager-alidns-webhook`](https://github.com/crazygit/cert-manager-alidns-webhook)(Suport ACK RRSA)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks a bit odd. I am no expert on AliDNS, but why didn't you contribute "ACK RRSA" to the AliDNS webhook linked in the line above?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@erikgb Thanks for the question — I agree it’s important to avoid unnecessary duplication.

  • What’s different here: this repo is designed around ACK RRSA / OIDC and the Alibaba Cloud SDK default credential chain, so authentication happens on the webhook side without putting AK/SK into Issuer secrets. The existing AliDNS webhook is AK/SK‑based, configured via Issuer secrets, so the auth model is quite different.

  • Why I didn’t submit to the other repo: adding RRSA support there would likely be more than a small patch — it would involve changes to the auth flow, config schema, and docs, and I wanted to avoid disrupting existing AK/SK users. I also wanted to keep the RRSA‑first approach focused and clear, since it targets newer cert-manager versions and the ACK RRSA identity scenario specifically.

Thanks for considering this and for the review.

- [`cert-manager-webhook-abion`](https://github.com/abiondevelopment/cert-manager-webhook-abion)
- [`cert-manager-webhook-arvan`](https://github.com/kiandigital/cert-manager-webhook-arvan)
- [`cert-manager-webhook-civo`](https://github.com/okteto/cert-manager-webhook-civo)
Expand Down