make PR_TEST_MATRIX_EXTRAS_GPU use 2026-based relvals instead of 2025#2665
make PR_TEST_MATRIX_EXTRAS_GPU use 2026-based relvals instead of 2025#2665smuzaffar merged 1 commit intocms-sw:masterfrom
PR_TEST_MATRIX_EXTRAS_GPU use 2026-based relvals instead of 2025#2665Conversation
… (both for 16.1.X and 16.0.X)
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for branch master. @akritkbehera, @cmsbuild, @iarspider, @raoatifshad, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
enable gpu |
|
@cmsbuild, please test for CMSSW_16_0_X |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3e29f6/50991/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_MI300X Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_W7900 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_H100 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_L40S Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
please test |
let's start with this one, otherwise we're blind to Run3 HLT on GPU... |
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-AMD_W7900 Failed RelVals-AMD_W7900
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
these failures are unrelated, due to cms-sw/cmssw#49795 |
|
+externals |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
In PR:
relval2025autoHLT key toFake2cmssw#49747 (16.1.X)relval2025autoHLT key toFake2[16.0.X] cmssw#49766 (16.0.X)we changed the default HLT menu run in 2025 relvals to be the
Fakeone.This makes the relval GPU matrix not as useful as it could be, because we can't run the heterogenous reco in the HLT itself.
Thsi PR proposes to run the 2026 equivalent workflows that are already in the relval_gpu matrix.
@AdrianoDee FYI