Update oneTBB to v2022.3.0#10158
Conversation
|
please test |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard for branch IB/CMSSW_16_0_X/master. @akritkbehera, @iarspider, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2ebadb/49117/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@makortel @Dr15Jones , do you want some local tests before we integrate it? If needed I can integrate it in DEVEL IBs first |
|
I'm not concerned about a local test before integration as long as it is done after CMSSW_16_0_0_pre2 is out :). |
Not really.
I'm not sure that is necessary. I am a bit concerned though about the large number of comparison differences and they seem to be concentrated to a few phase 2 workflows
TBB update shouldn't really change physics results... |
Indeed, it shouldn't 🤷🏻♂️ I'll re-run the tests once pre2 is out. |
|
please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2ebadb/49161/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+externals |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_16_0_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
No description provided.