Add CXXFLAGS for unused result warning#10492
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @akritkbehera for branch IB/CMSSW_17_0_X/master. @akritkbehera, @cmsbuild, @iarspider, @raoatifshad, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
test_parametes:
|
|
please test |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f97beb/52720/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
test parameters:
|
|
please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f97beb/52727/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
I'm (positively) surprised we didn't have any cases in the code that would have been flagged! |
|
Please test There was a typo in the full test parameter comment so previous tests did not build full cmssw |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f97beb/52732/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
please build for el10_amd64_gcc15 |
|
please build for CMSSW_17_0_CLANG_X |
|
+externals |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_17_0_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
No description provided.