Increase Nano relval WF counter buffer size#48459
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48459/45378
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ftorrresd for master. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @cmsbuild, @DickyChant, @miquork, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
enable nano |
|
please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelValsValueError: Undefined workflows: 2500.301 NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
|
please test |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48459/45381
|
|
Pull request #48459 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @DickyChant, @miquork, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again. |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
|
assign xpog |
|
New categories assigned: xpog @ftorrresd,@hqucms you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
|
+xpog |
|
+pdmv |
|
+Upgrade |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
Increase Nano relval WF counter buffer size, in order to avoid situations like: #48163 (comment) .
PR validation:
Tested locally. Expect WF number were generated.