Updated SuperclusterDNN v3 for superclustering in TICLv5 #48811
Updated SuperclusterDNN v3 for superclustering in TICLv5 #48811cmsbuild merged 9 commits intocms-sw:masterfrom
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48811/45919
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
|
allow @waredjeb test rights |
|
allow @sameasy test rights |
|
type hgcal |
|
test parameters: |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48811/45921
|
|
Ok including #49023 the HGCAL differences on ticlCandidates are expected (we produce less candidates because of the tigher filter on LCs). The problem with 771 with differences in EGM tracking are still there. The differences could be expected as we are modifying the SuperClusters but it is not clear why they are seen only in 771 and not in other workflows with TICLv5. I'll continue investigating |
|
test parameters:
|
|
@cmsbuild please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals
|
|
@waredjeb I think we missed to add |
|
test parameters:
|
|
@cmsbuild please test |
thanks marco! |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here:
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
there is too much churn going on in tests (due also to #49073). Let's wait to have the solution to that merged and run a final round of tests. |
ok perfect, thanks! |
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
Hi @mmusich , looks like we don't have the differences anymore, what do you think? |
there are changes in the trigger results (in L1 algos?). Probably not related though. |
|
+hlt |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
for completeness I re-run the tests in a vacuum at #49063 (comment) and I don't see the same. I wonder if it reproduces here. |
If I understood correctly the differences, they are shown in workflow 29634.0 which is the default (no procModifiers) with TICLv4. This PR does not touch anything in TICLv4 so I would guess it should not be related to this PR. But if you have doubts I can try to run additional tests |
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+1 |
This PR introduces a new version (v3) of the SuperclusterDNN to be used for superclustering in TICLv5. This PR includes updates to the previous DNN model as well as the superclustering algorithm. The model and algorithm are used for reconstructing electromagnetic objects within TICL.
-This PR needs to be tested with the following cms-data PR: cms-data/RecoHGCal-TICL#9
-It needs to be tested with the following workflows
. 29646.203
. 29846.203
-Validation plots are attached.
Validation_SuperclusterDNN_v3_4Sept_GSokmen.pdf
@waredjeb @felicepantaleo @sameasy