[14_0] Add dedicated 2024 FastSim workflow#48991
[14_0] Add dedicated 2024 FastSim workflow#48991cmsbuild merged 1 commit intocms-sw:CMSSW_14_0_Xfrom
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob for CMSSW_14_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @DickyChant, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
test parameters:
|
|
@cmsbuild please test |
|
Hi @cms-sw/orp-l2 |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
2024 FastSim workflow runs OK. FYI @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 |
|
+pdmv |
|
@cmsbuild ping |
|
backport of #48153 |
No, there hasn't been any request for a new 14_0_X release. Given the pace of 14_0_X releases, I would propose to simply build a patch. |
|
+1 |
|
+Upgrade |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_16_0_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
This is a partial backport of #48153
Note that, since I don't do backport for all workflows that added in between, including 20242024HLTOnDigi, 2024HLTOnDigiPU, 2024GenOnly, 2024SimOnGen, so I add an exception on workflow numbers in this PR. So the 2024FS workflow has the same id with CMSSW_14_2_X, and later.
Without dedicated 2024FS workflow, we will face an issue when try to run FastSim
PR validation:
Run 16434.0 and it works fine.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
This is a backport PR.