Phase 2 geometry deprecation

[kpedro88]

PR description:

Addresses #49563. The final set of removals is:

• Detectors: D95, D96, D98, D99, D100, D101, D102, D103, D105, D106, D107, D108, D109, D116, D117, D118, D119
• Tracker: T31, T32, T33, T34
  • remove from README: T15, T21, T24, T25, T26, T30
• Calorimeter: C17, C21, C23, C24
  • remove from README: C9, C10, C11, C13, C14, C15, C16
• Muon system: M13
  • remove from README: M4, M6, M7, M8, M9, M10, M11, M12
• MTD: I16, I19
  • remove from README: I10, I11, I12, I13, I14, I15
• Common:
  • remove from README: O4, O5, O6, O7, O8
• Forward:
  • remove from README: F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7

PR validation:

Geometry unit tests pass. runTheMatrix.py has the correct workflow numbers for the trained geometries.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, not intended to be backported.

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49725/47307

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_Run4.py modified in PR(s): GNN Track-Tracksters Linking in TICLv5 #49652
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py modified in PR(s): Add relvals for Run3 PbPb skims #49673
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): GNN Track-Tracksters Linking in TICLv5 #49652

[kpedro88]

please test

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/Geometry (geometry)
• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv)
• Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)

@AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @Dr15Jones, @antoniovagnerini, @bsunanda, @civanch, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @kpedro88, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @mdhildreth, @miquork can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@GiacomoSguazzoni, @Martin-Grunewald, @VinInn, @VourMa, @dgulhan, @elusian, @fabiocos, @felicepantaleo, @makortel, @mmasciov, @mmusich, @mtosi, @rovere, @sameasy, @slomeo, @vargasa this is something you requested to watch as well.
@ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[kpedro88]

@smuzaffar the bot or tests seem to be stuck?

[smuzaffar]

@kpedro88 , the dqm comparison job landed on a buggy node and failed without any notifications. I have restarted the comparison job. results should be available in an hour

[cmsbuild]

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0b1c44/50459/summary.html
COMMIT: b3a46fd
CMSSW: CMSSW_16_1_X_2026-01-06-2300/el8_amd64_gcc13
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/49725/50459/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
• ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
• Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
• Reco comparison had 4 failed jobs
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 53
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4280553
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 137
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4280396
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 52 files compared)
• Checked 227 log files, 198 edm output root files, 53 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[bsunanda]

+geometry

[AdrianoDee]

+pdmv

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[ftenchini]

+1

[makortel]

Looks like this PR caused some knock-on failures in IBs #49772