Skip to content

Update HLTPixelThrustFilter to consider saturated pixels#50167

Merged
cmsbuild merged 3 commits intocms-sw:masterfrom
stahlleiton:HLTPixelThrustFilter_CMSSW_16_1_X
Mar 7, 2026
Merged

Update HLTPixelThrustFilter to consider saturated pixels#50167
cmsbuild merged 3 commits intocms-sw:masterfrom
stahlleiton:HLTPixelThrustFilter_CMSSW_16_1_X

Conversation

@stahlleiton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR description:

This PR updates the HLTPixelThrustFilter module, which filters on the transverse thrust value of pixel clusters, to allow the option to also compute the transverse thrust considering only saturated pixel clusters or to cut on the number of pixel clusters.

This HLT filter is only used so far in the HIon menu to search for low-mass magnetic monopoles in ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions, which apart from leading to large values of transverse thrust are also expected to be highly ionizing and tend to saturate the pixel clusters. As such, adding the option to select on saturated clusters can help to further reduce the contributions from beam background, which in 2025 PbPb data taking ended up been much larger than in previous years.

PR validation:

Tested with relvals 141.201,141.202,142.201,142.202,143.201,143.202,144.201,144.202,180.0.180.1,181.0,181.1,182.0,182.1,183.0,183.1

@mandrenguyen @flodamas @vince502

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 17, 2026

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @stahlleiton for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • HLTrigger/special (hlt)

@Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @mmusich can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @mmusich this is something you requested to watch as well.
@ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

please test

Comment thread HLTrigger/special/plugins/HLTPixelThrustFilter.cc Outdated
Comment thread HLTrigger/special/plugins/HLTPixelThrustFilter.cc Outdated
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-831e06/51388/summary.html
COMMIT: 964ef94
CMSSW: CMSSW_16_1_X_2026-02-17-2300/el8_amd64_gcc13
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/50167/51388/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 1 lines to the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 1 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 53
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4167466
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4167443
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 52 files compared)
  • Checked 227 log files, 198 edm output root files, 53 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull request #50167 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @mmusich, @tvami can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mmusich commented Feb 18, 2026

test parameters:

  • workflows = 141.201, 141.202, 142.201, 142.202, 143.201, 143.202, 144.201, 144.202, 180.0, 180.1, 181.0, 181.1, 182.0, 182.1, 183.0, 183.1

@mmusich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mmusich commented Feb 18, 2026

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 4, 2026

Pull request #50167 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @mmusich, @tvami can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mmusich commented Mar 4, 2026

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 4, 2026

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-831e06/51746/summary.html
COMMIT: bf1d445
CMSSW: CMSSW_16_1_X_2026-03-04-1100/el8_amd64_gcc13
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/50167/51746/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:


size_t nSatPixels(0);
std::vector<reco::LeafCandidate> vec;
vec.reserve(clusters.size() * 1000);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

where's the 1000 coming from?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked locally with HIForward data and UPC MC, and saw that there were up to around 250 clusters in a detset, so to be conservative I multiplied the number of detsets by 1000 to reserve the vector. If prefered, I could either remove the reserve or count the total number clusters before reserving.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure how stable that number is going to be at the very end of the lifetime of the detector.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, in 915148b now it counts the total before reserving

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 5, 2026

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 5, 2026

Pull request #50167 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @mmusich, @tvami can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mmusich commented Mar 5, 2026

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 5, 2026

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-831e06/51788/summary.html
COMMIT: 915148b
CMSSW: CMSSW_16_1_X_2026-03-05-1100/el8_amd64_gcc13
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/50167/51788/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2026

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2026

Pull request #50167 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @mmusich, @tvami can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mmusich commented Mar 6, 2026

+hlt

@stahlleiton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cms-sw/analysis-l2 : Please have a look and let me know if you have further comments or it is fine to sign, thanks.

@mmusich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mmusich commented Mar 6, 2026

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2026

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-831e06/51795/summary.html
COMMIT: 56faab0
CMSSW: CMSSW_16_1_X_2026-03-05-2300/el8_amd64_gcc13
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/50167/51795/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@tvami
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tvami commented Mar 6, 2026

+1

  • looks good, thanks!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2026

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants