-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 279
Adding calibration dataformat constants #3053
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ | |
| "DL2_TEL_GEOMETRY_GROUP", | ||
| "DL2_TEL_ENERGY_GROUP", | ||
| "DL2_TEL_PARTICLETYPE_GROUP", | ||
| "DL2_TEL_IMPACT_GROUP", | ||
| "DL0_TEL_POINTING_GROUP", | ||
| "DL1_SUBARRAY_POINTING_GROUP", | ||
| "DL1_TEL_POINTING_GROUP", | ||
|
|
@@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ | |
| "DL1_SKY_PEDESTAL_IMAGE_GROUP", | ||
| "DL1_FLATFIELD_IMAGE_GROUP", | ||
| "DL1_FLATFIELD_PEAK_TIME_GROUP", | ||
| "DL1_MONITORING_ATMOSPHERE", | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What's the plan of interfacing of this with existing atmospheric module? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't understand your comment. Do you mean the connection with ATMOSPHERE_DENSITY_PROFILE_TABLE?
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I got an impression you were planning also to store the contemporary VAOD profiles, and I would naively assume that have to be eventually combined with the density profiles in order to compute the total attenuation of the Cherenkov light. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I see. Let me clarify. I do plan to store the VAOD. However the VAOD is not a profile, it is a single value expressing the optical depth at zenith from the ground to the top of the atmosphere.
Indeed one has to combine the Rayleigh scattering profile (not density) with molecular absorption and aerosol profiles. But this is outside of the scope of this PR.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. the atmosphere density profile is Service data, and this is Monitoring, so it think it's clear that they are different. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hi @kosack , I am wondering if the atmosphere density profile should be service data. CalibPipe will produce density profiles to be used for tailored simulations. That should be then monitoring data, right?
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Monitoring data is something that changes in time during an observation, i.e. it is a table with a TIMESTAMP column, and values that are interpolated to the event time. An atmosphere profile is at least static for a given day. or obs_id, I guess, right? You would not expect to have to interpolate it to an event time. If so, it should still be Service data. But if you plan to write out a time-series of these for a given night or something like that, then it could be Monitoring. What is the plan? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hi @kosack , an atmospheric density model will be static for a day or OB (I am not sure if that's somewhere documented but I don't think it makes sense to produce density models in time intervals shorter than an OB, the density changes slowly). On the other hand, we might produce more than one extinction profile within one OB, when estimating good time intervals.
That makes me think that the inter - cross calibration coefficients should go to service data as well... |
||
| "DL2_SUBARRAY_MONITORING_GROUP", | ||
| "DL2_SUBARRAY_INTER_CALIBRATION_GROUP", | ||
| "DL2_SUBARRAY_CROSS_CALIBRATION_GROUP", | ||
|
|
@@ -102,6 +104,7 @@ | |
| DL2_TEL_GEOMETRY_GROUP = "/dl2/event/telescope/geometry" | ||
| DL2_TEL_ENERGY_GROUP = "/dl2/event/telescope/energy" | ||
| DL2_TEL_PARTICLETYPE_GROUP = "/dl2/event/telescope/particle_type" | ||
| DL2_TEL_IMPACT_GROUP = "/dl2/event/telescope/impact" | ||
|
|
||
| DL2_GROUP = "/dl2" | ||
| DL2_SUBARRAY_GROUP = "/dl2/event/subarray" | ||
|
|
@@ -152,6 +155,7 @@ | |
| DL1_PIXEL_HISTOGRAMS_GROUP = ( | ||
| "/dl1/monitoring/telescope/calibration/camera/pixel_histograms" | ||
| ) | ||
| DL1_MONITORING_ATMOSPHERE = "/dl1/monitoring/atmosphere" | ||
| DL2_SUBARRAY_MONITORING_GROUP = "/dl2/monitoring/subarray" | ||
| DL2_SUBARRAY_INTER_CALIBRATION_GROUP = "/dl2/monitoring/subarray/inter_calibration" | ||
| DL2_SUBARRAY_CROSS_CALIBRATION_GROUP = "/dl2/monitoring/subarray/cross_calibration" | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.