-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
Exclude generated code from coverage #23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
breml
wants to merge
3
commits into
dave:master
Choose a base branch
from
breml:skip-generated-code
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, maybe it would be good to make the check a bit more thorough, similar to the
isGeneratedfrom thelinttool?just to be a bit more strict / thorough and not exclude some frankenstein file with a comment floating around somewhere mid-file?
https://pkg.go.dev/cmd/go#hdr-Generate_Go_files_by_processing_source specifies:
you can see the test case as well from here which things should be valid: https://github.com/golang/lint/blob/85993ffd0a6cd043291f3f63d45d656d97b165bd/lint_test.go#L292
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rubensayshi You are right and I am aware of this specification (I linked it myself in hexdigest/gowrap#20). My issue is, that one of my main use-cases is exactly with
gowrapand this tool generates a valid comment, but does not (yet) comply with strict requirement for the position, because the comment is inserted after thepackagestatement.If you agree, I can change the detection, such that it complies with the test set you linked, which would be sufficient for me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rubensayshi I added the
isGeneratedfunction you linked to in a separate commit.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ehm, I suppose it's fine to adjust
isGeneratedto also acceptpackagebefore the comment as an exception?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is already the case in the "original" version of
isGenerated, see:courtney/scanner/generated_test.go
Line 25 in 0e4312f
I assume, this because this code predates the decision in golang/go#41196