fix: make changes for conda-forge compatibility

[john-halloran]

@sbillinge Thanks for your patience while I had put this off. This should be everything we talked about for 0.2.1. The one place I don't think we came to an agreement was around python version. Currently the recipe says <3.14 because we only support up to 3.13. I believe the original plan was that supporting 3.14 would come with snmf 0.3. Does that clear it up?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 75.60%. Comparing base (d7586bc) to head (bce6337).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
tests/test_snmf_optimizer.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #200      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.50%   75.60%   -1.90%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines          40       41       +1     
==========================================
  Hits           31       31              
- Misses          9       10       +1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
tests/test_snmf_optimizer.py	95.65% <66.66%> (-4.35%)	⬇️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sbillinge]

lgtm

[sbillinge]

OK, I pushed out 0.2.1-rc.0. If it builds correctly I can push out the full release and then we can try again with conda-forge.

[john-halloran]

@sbillinge The local build and installation of the rc were successful. You should be able to move ahead with the release.

[sbillinge]

ok, that went out.