-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
Make Razor a built in feature of the Roslyn language server #83575
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
davidwengier
wants to merge
10
commits into
dotnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
davidwengier:RazorInRoslynLSP
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7a6e3c0
Remove local testing skill
davidwengier 9378ce0
Package the Razor extension with the Roslyn language server package
davidwengier 14edb00
Remove --razorSourceGenerator option. It wasn't used anyway
davidwengier 451eb99
Remove razorDesignTimeTargets option
davidwengier 62288bf
Expand Remote.Razor runtime identifiers
davidwengier 28e314b
Stop publishing VSCode Razor extension package
davidwengier 333225e
Strengthen test assertions
davidwengier 2be36f9
Be case insensitive
davidwengier 1270ab9
Roslyn tests have no telemetry, but we're part of the MEF composition
davidwengier b7972c7
Merge branch 'main' into RazorInRoslynLSP
davidwengier File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
173 changes: 0 additions & 173 deletions
173
.github/skills/run-vscode-local-testing/scripts/Start-LocalVsCode.ps1
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Disposing this before the assert might be defeating the point this part of the test. Should line 90 just become a using context instead?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The missing dispose is something copilot noticed, but I did think the same thing. The test above already has the context.Dispose call, and it is before the wait and assert though, so I assumed it to be correct.