ppc64 JIT: fix float <=/>= with NaN operands - #413
Closed
runlevel5 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
OP_LEF/OP_GEF mapped to a single CR0 test (branch if !GT / !LT). PPC FCMPU sets only CR0[SO] when an operand is NaN, leaving LT/GT/EQ clear, so those conditions wrongly took the branch on unordered operands - diverging from the interpreter and aarch64 (where NaN <= / >= is false). Fold the unordered bit into the tested bit via cror before the branch (GT |= SO for <=, LT |= SO for >=) so a NaN operand does not branch. Ordered comparisons and the other four float compares are unaffected; the integer LE/GE paths are untouched. Verified with a differential harness (JIT vs interpreter): NaN <= / >= 1.0 returned 1 on the JIT before and 0 after, matching the interpreter.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The PPC64 JIT compiled
OP_LEF/OP_GEFas a single CR0 test, butfcmpuonly sets the SO bit on a NaN operand, soNaN <= xandNaN >= xwrongly took the branch. Now folds the unordered bit in viacrorso it matches the interpreter and the aarch64 JIT (both false). Other float compares and the integer paths are unchanged. Verified with a JIT-vs-interpreter diff:NaN <= 1.0returned 1 before, 0 after.