Enable eln-extensions view

[yselkowitz]

This was just split out of ELN Extras:

fedora-eln/content-resolver-input#1645
fedora-eln/eln#594

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the build process to include the eln-extensions label alongside existing labels.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 08cc27c0-50f7-4c9b-be07-1f9c89878e75

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef7c73d and 4f3ebca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• refresh.sh

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The refresh command now passes the eln-extensions label to the content resolver alongside eln and eln-extras.

Changes

ELN refresh configuration

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Content resolver label update refresh.sh	The content resolver invocation now processes eln-extensions with the existing labels.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers: bhoy-troy

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the change that enables the eln-extensions view.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[sgallagher]

Seems fine, but I wonder what this will do for the runtime.

[yselkowitz]

If you mean "run time", not much, given that Extensions is a few dozen packages on x86_64 and only a handful on other arches (ROCm being the difference), and these were already listed in Extras, I'm just splitting them out now to get Extras closer to EPEL (only).