docs: codify Code Lawyer standards

[flyingrobots]

Summary

• Adds CODE_STANDARDS.md as the repo-native Code Lawyer audit and repair doctrine.
• Links CODE_STANDARDS.md from AGENTS.md context recovery and bedrock docs.
• Adds a deterministic docs regression so the standards remain discoverable from AGENTS.md.

Verification

• RED: pnpm test:local --run test/unit/release/code-standards.test.ts failed before CODE_STANDARDS.md existed.
• GREEN: pnpm test:local --run test/unit/release/code-standards.test.ts passed.
• git diff --check passed.
• pnpm lint passed.
• pnpm typecheck passed.
• pnpm test passed, Docker-isolated, 218 files / 1596 tests.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Added test suite for documentation standards validation.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@flyingrobots has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 57 minutes and 28 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 8e0d09ba-3e52-416f-a0cc-9ddadbd1e7d0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a76efc and df786e1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• CODE_STANDARDS.md is excluded by !**/*.md

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• test/unit/release/code-standards.test.ts

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A test file is added that reads CODE_STANDARDS.md and AGENTS.md from the repository root and verifies they contain required documentation structure and cross-references.

Changes

Code Standards Verification Test

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Code standards documentation verification test test/unit/release/code-standards.test.ts	File utilities compute repository root via import.meta.url and provide a readRepoFile helper; test suite validates CODE_STANDARDS.md contains required headings ("# CODE_STANDARDS", "Code Lawyer", "Phase 0: Lockdown", "Merge Gate") and AGENTS.md references CODE_STANDARDS.md.

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Whiskers twitch with delight, the test suite's born,
CODE_STANDARDS now guarded from morning to morn,
Docs stay aligned, with care and with grace,
A watchful test keeps standards in place. 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'docs: codify Code Lawyer standards' directly relates to the PR's main objective of creating and enforcing CODE_STANDARDS.md documentation, but is somewhat abbreviated and doesn't fully clarify that the change includes both documentation and test additions.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/code-standards

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[flyingrobots]

@codex second opinion requested. Code Lawyer self-audit found one issue before merge.

Issue	Severity	Source	File	Lines	Recommended mitigation
The Code Lawyer standards document records the required gh authentication failure halt text as Auth error - run ..., but the mandated workflow specifies the exact operator-facing text Auth error — run \gh auth login` and retry.`. The standards should not encode a weaker or different canonical halt message.	P3 Docs	Self	CODE_STANDARDS.md	46-50	Add a deterministic standards regression for the exact auth-failure text, update CODE_STANDARDS.md to the mandated text, verify focused standards tests plus lint/typecheck/full tests, then commit the fix.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6a76efcc98

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[flyingrobots]

Activity Summary

Issue	Severity	File	Commit SHA	Outcome
Code Lawyer standards used Auth error - run ... instead of the mandated Auth error — run \gh auth login` and retry.` halt text.	P3 Docs	CODE_STANDARDS.md; test/unit/release/code-standards.test.ts	df786e1	Added a deterministic standards assertion for the exact auth-failure text, updated the standards document to match the mandated wording, pushed the branch, and resolved the matching Codex review thread via GraphQL.

Verification:

• RED: pnpm test:local --run test/unit/release/code-standards.test.ts failed before the standards text was corrected.
• GREEN: pnpm test:local --run test/unit/release/code-standards.test.ts passed after the standards update.
• Whitespace: git diff --check passed.
• Lint: pnpm lint passed.
• Typecheck: pnpm typecheck passed.
• Full test gate: pnpm test passed in Docker isolation, 218 files / 1596 tests.

Thread status: Codex review thread PRRT_kwDOR3kM9M6B1q5S is resolved.