Skip to content

node-pools: document arm64 worker pools on AWS#3125

Open
njuettner wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
arm64-worker-node-pools
Open

node-pools: document arm64 worker pools on AWS#3125
njuettner wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
arm64-worker-node-pools

Conversation

@njuettner
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Towards giantswarm/roadmap#4300

Adds a new section to the node pools tutorial documenting how to run arm64 (AWS Graviton) worker pools using the architecture field on global.nodePools. Available from Giant Swarm release version 35 (cluster-aws v8.5.0 — giantswarm/cluster-aws#1920).

Adds a new section to the node pools tutorial documenting how to run
arm64 (AWS Graviton) worker pools using the `architecture` field on
`global.nodePools`. Available from Giant Swarm release version 35
(cluster-aws v8.5.0 -- giantswarm/cluster-aws#1920).
@njuettner njuettner requested a review from a team as a code owner May 21, 2026 14:33
Comment thread src/content/tutorials/fleet-management/cluster-management/node-pools/index.md Outdated
…-pools/index.md

Co-authored-by: Fernando Ripoll <fernando@giantswarm.io>
@njuettner njuettner requested a review from a team May 21, 2026 14:52
- **`instanceType`**: must be an arm64 family (for example `m7g.xlarge`, `t4g.medium`). x86_64 instance types will fail to boot.
- **A `kubernetes.io/arch=arm64:NoSchedule` taint** under `customNodeTaints`: prevents amd64-only workloads from being scheduled onto the pool. This taint is not added automatically, intentionally, so it doesn't override existing taint configuration.

Example values mixing x86_64 and arm64 pools in the same cluster:
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Example values mixing x86_64 and arm64 pools in the same cluster:
An example of configuration values mixing x86_64 and arm64 pools in the same cluster:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants