Skip to content

Update vitest npm packages (major)#8129

Open
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/js/major-vitest-npm-packages
Open

Update vitest npm packages (major)#8129
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/js/major-vitest-npm-packages

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot commented Nov 30, 2025

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@vitest/coverage-istanbul (source) 3.2.44.1.5 age confidence
vite-plugin-dts (source) 4.5.45.0.0 age confidence
vitest (source) 3.2.44.1.5 age confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (@​vitest/coverage-istanbul)

v4.1.5

Compare Source

   🚀 Experimental Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.4

Compare Source

   🚀 Experimental Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.3

Compare Source

   🚀 Experimental Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.2

Compare Source

This release bumps Vitest's flatted version and removes version pinning to resolve flatted's CVE related issues (#​9975).

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.1

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.0

Compare Source

Vitest 4.1 is out!

This release page lists all changes made to the project during the 4.1 beta. To get a review of all the new features, read our blog post.

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge November 30, 2025 14:12
@github-actions github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps > hash-api Affects the HASH API (app) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team area/tests New or updated tests area/tests > integration New or updated integration tests area/apps labels Nov 30, 2025
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Nov 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.49%. Comparing base (775f4cc) to head (db2532d).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8129   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.49%   62.49%           
=======================================
  Files        1318     1320    +2     
  Lines      134235   134276   +41     
  Branches     5521     5511   -10     
=======================================
+ Hits        83894    83921   +27     
- Misses      49426    49440   +14     
  Partials      915      915           
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.40% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.49% <ø> (+0.25%) ⬆️
local.hash-graph-sdk 9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.19% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 26.38% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 92.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@cursor
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cursor Bot commented Dec 13, 2025

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Major-version upgrade of the unit test runner/coverage tooling across multiple workspaces may break test runs or CI due to config/behavior changes, though production code is untouched.

Overview
Updates test tooling across the monorepo by bumping vitest and @vitest/coverage-istanbul from 3.2.4 to 4.1.5 in multiple package.json files (apps, libs, tests, and Claude hooks).

Also bumps vite-plugin-dts from 4.5.4 to 5.0.0 in @hashintel/ds-components.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 71b6874. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Comment thread libs/@local/harpc/client/typescript/package.json Outdated
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented Jan 15, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
ds-theme Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 14, 2026 10:26am
hash Error Error May 14, 2026 10:26am
hashdotdesign Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 14, 2026 10:26am
hashdotdesign-tokens Error Error May 14, 2026 10:26am
petrinaut Error Error May 14, 2026 10:26am

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks


Comparing deps/js/major-vitest-npm-packages (db2532d) with main (775f4cc)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (6f130ab) during the generation of this report, so 775f4cc was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Deployment failed with the following error:

Creating the Deployment Timed Out.

Comment thread tests/hash-backend-integration/package.json Outdated
Comment thread .claude/hooks/package.json Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with Cloud Agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Comment thread libs/@local/harpc/client/typescript/package.json Outdated
Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed
Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed
Comment thread yarn.lock Outdated
linkType: hard

"vite@npm:8.0.0, vite@npm:^6.0.0 || ^7.0.0 || ^8.0.0-0":
"vite@npm:8.0.0":
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@semgrep-code-hashintel semgrep-code-hashintel Bot Apr 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Risk: Affected versions of vite are vulnerable to Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor / Missing Authentication for Critical Function. This occurs because the Vite Dev Server WebSocket improperly exposes the fetchModule method, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass filesystem restrictions and read arbitrary files from the host machine

Manual Review Advice: A vulnerability from this advisory is reachable if you enable vite dev server using --host flag and websocket is not disabled

Fix: Upgrade this library to at least version 8.0.5 at hash/yarn.lock:45627.

Reference(s): GHSA-p9ff-h696-f583, CVE-2026-39363

🎉 Fixed in commit 3f42185 🎉

Comment thread yarn.lock Outdated
linkType: hard

"vite@npm:8.0.0, vite@npm:^6.0.0 || ^7.0.0 || ^8.0.0-0":
"vite@npm:8.0.0":
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@semgrep-code-hashintel semgrep-code-hashintel Bot Apr 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Risk: Affected versions of vite are vulnerable to Improper Access Control / Incorrect Behavior Order. Vite's dev server can bypass server.fs.deny protections: if the server is exposed to the network and a denied file is within an allowed directory, an attacker can retrieve sensitive files such as .env or certificate files by requesting them with query parameters like ?raw, ?import&raw, or ?import&url&inline.

Manual Review Advice: A vulnerability from this advisory is reachable if you enable vite dev server using --host flag and have sensitive data in deny list

Fix: Upgrade this library to at least version 8.0.5 at hash/yarn.lock:45627.

Reference(s): GHSA-v2wj-q39q-566r, CVE-2026-39364

Fixed in commit 3f42185

Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed
Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed
Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed
Comment thread yarn.lock Fixed
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$43.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}14.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$4.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.396 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.367 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.881 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.300 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$53.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$44.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.389 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$48.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 230 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.297 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$61.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 403 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$61.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.803 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$55.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 451 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$95.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 578 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$45.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.741 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$289 \mathrm{ms} \pm 909 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.954 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$18.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.964 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$19.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$25.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.623 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$19.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.898 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$18.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.034 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.756 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.168 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$36.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 359 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$36.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 360 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.433 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$34.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$33.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 339 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$94.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 650 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 656 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 671 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 620 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 647 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.986 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 679 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 558 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.835 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 532 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.836 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 600 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.005 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 560 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.360 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 628 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$156 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.44 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-14.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$149 \mathrm{ms} \pm 560 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.015 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$41.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$537 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.12 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.578 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

@hash-worker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

hash-worker Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: yarn.lock
error This project's package.json defines "packageManager": "yarn@4.12.0". However the current global version of Yarn is 1.22.22.

Presence of the "packageManager" field indicates that the project is meant to be used with Corepack, a tool included by default with all official Node.js distributions starting from 16.9 and 14.19.
Corepack must currently be enabled by running corepack enable in your terminal. For more information, check out https://yarnpkg.com/corepack.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/apps > hash.design Affects the `hash.design` design site (app) area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps > hash-api Affects the HASH API (app) area/apps area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) area/tests > integration New or updated integration tests area/tests New or updated tests type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants