[wip] fixing nidm search, adding broad_search regardles of the NIDM c…#34
Open
djarecka wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[wip] fixing nidm search, adding broad_search regardles of the NIDM c…#34djarecka wants to merge 1 commit into
djarecka wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
@satra - could you please remind me what you would use to match the terms instead of this: https://github.com/incf-nidash/nidmterms-ui/pull/34/files#diff-dfb74ac8ed89184ba47251dd98d47b239c7d8e685930efe607a579a62a5c8b1cR74 |
Collaborator
|
i would suggest using: https://lunrjs.com/ (it supports fuzzy matching, and other nice search operations). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixing nidm search, adding broad_search regardless of the NIDM concept search
@nqueder - this is not finished, but are you able to check this locally and see if it looks better to you?
I'm having issues with creating website with github.io with this branch...