Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Agent Tabs Missing Footer System #262
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Agent Tabs Missing Footer System #262
Changes from all commits
3337998File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Use a single owner for footer subtraction.
ResizeForFooteralready removes the footer and tab-header space before invoking tab resizing, so the new local subtraction shortens every agent viewport by three rows. The resize paths and their documentation should share one explicit height contract. (raw.githubusercontent.com)internal/tui/output_view.go#L125-L139: remove the second footer subtraction and consume the content height supplied byTabManager.internal/tui/output_view.go#L78-L86: remove the child resize path or make it use the same content-height contract.internal/tui/output_view.go#L13-L28: document the actual ownership of footer sizing.internal/tui/tui.go#L753-L770: align the unified-footer documentation with that contract.📍 Affects 2 files
internal/tui/output_view.go#L125-L139(this comment)internal/tui/output_view.go#L78-L86internal/tui/output_view.go#L13-L28internal/tui/tui.go#L753-L770🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Document the actual resize contract.
These comments say
OutputViewreceives total height and must subtract the footer, butResizeForFooterpasses already-adjusted content height to each tab. Update this wording together with the sizing fix so future changes do not reintroduce the double subtraction. (raw.githubusercontent.com)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents