Skip to content

refactor: STORIF-335 - Object storage drawers refactored.#13540

Open
dchyrva-akamai wants to merge 9 commits intolinode:developfrom
dchyrva-akamai:feature/STORIF-335
Open

refactor: STORIF-335 - Object storage drawers refactored.#13540
dchyrva-akamai wants to merge 9 commits intolinode:developfrom
dchyrva-akamai:feature/STORIF-335

Conversation

@dchyrva-akamai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description 📝

Refactored object storage drawers to be standalone components and use browser navigation.

Changes 🔄

  • Created new queries for creating/updating/deleting access keys.
  • Created new queries for retrieving single access key/bucket.
  • Removed outdated drawers.
  • Created outlet components for the bucket/access key drawers.

How to test 🧪

  • Run pnpm dev.
  • Navigate to /object-storage/buckets.
  • Try creating bucket.
  • Observe drawer works as expected.
  • Try viewing bucket details.
  • Observe drawer works as expected.
  • Navigate to /object-storage/access-keys.
  • Try creating/editing/viewing key details.
  • Observe drawers work as expected.
Author Checklists

As an Author, to speed up the review process, I considered 🤔

👀 Doing a self review
❔ Our contribution guidelines
🤏 Splitting feature into small PRs
➕ Adding a changeset
🧪 Providing/improving test coverage
🔐 Removing all sensitive information from the code and PR description
🚩 Using a feature flag to protect the release
👣 Providing comprehensive reproduction steps
📑 Providing or updating our documentation
🕛 Scheduling a pair reviewing session
📱 Providing mobile support
♿ Providing accessibility support


  • I have read and considered all applicable items listed above.

As an Author, before moving this PR from Draft to Open, I confirmed ✅

  • All tests and CI checks are passing
  • TypeScript compilation succeeded without errors
  • Code passes all linting rules

Comment thread packages/manager/src/features/ObjectStorage/AccessKeyLanding/AccessKeyLanding.tsx Outdated
@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2026 14:14
@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai requested a review from a team as a code owner March 27, 2026 14:14
@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai force-pushed the feature/STORIF-335 branch 3 times, most recently from 84ab992 to 998134e Compare March 27, 2026 15:38
@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai requested a review from a team as a code owner March 27, 2026 17:29
@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai requested review from jdamore-linode and removed request for a team March 27, 2026 17:29
@bnussman-akamai bnussman-akamai added the Object Storage deals with Object Storage label Mar 30, 2026
@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai force-pushed the feature/STORIF-335 branch 5 times, most recently from 020ba3e to 81a0ade Compare April 14, 2026 13:37
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dwiley-akamai dwiley-akamai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Verification steps ✅
Code review ✅

Approved pending addition of manager changeset

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's rename the pertinent files accordingly to remove OMC_ as well

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was renamed in the original PR, but I asked to rename it back to make the changes in the component more apparent - we planned to change this in a separate PR, but I guess we could change it right away.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be moved to src/hooks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for you comment, this hook will only be used inside the ObjectStorage, I think it would be better to keep it closer, inside the feature folder int order to avoid future misuse.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review to Approved in Cloud Manager Apr 14, 2026
@linode-gh-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Cloud Manager UI test results

🔺 2 failing tests on test run #17 ↗︎

❌ Failing✅ Passing↪️ Skipped🕐 Duration
2 Failing900 Passing11 Skipped50m 20s

Details

Failing Tests
SpecTest
access-key.e2e.spec.tsCloud Manager Cypress Tests→object storage access key end-to-end tests » can create an access key with limited access - e2e
object-storage.e2e.spec.tsCloud Manager Cypress Tests→object storage end-to-end tests » can update bucket access

Troubleshooting

Use this command to re-run the failing tests:

pnpm cy:run -s "cypress/e2e/core/objectStorage/access-key.e2e.spec.ts,cypress/e2e/core/objectStorage/object-storage.e2e.spec.ts"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Object Storage deals with Object Storage

Projects

Status: Approved

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants