Open
Conversation
The sync.Locker used with a sync.Cond must be acquired when changing the associated condition, otherwise there is a window within sync.Cond.Wait() where a wake-up may be missed. Fixes: 4846070 ("device: use a waiting sync.Pool instead of a channel") Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com> Signed-off-by: Jordan Whited <jordan@tailscale.com> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
…itPool Fixes: 3bb8fec ("conn, device, tun: implement vectorized I/O plumbing") Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com> Signed-off-by: Jordan Whited <jordan@tailscale.com> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Since 3c75945fd ("netstack: remove PacketBuffer.IsNil()") this has been
invalid. Follow the replacement pattern of that commit.
The old definition inlined to the same code anyway:
func (pk *PacketBuffer) IsNil() bool {
return pk == nil
}
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Colin's commit went a step further and protected tun.incomingPacket with a lock on shutdown, but let's see if the tun.stack.Close() call actually solves that on its own. Suggested-by: kshangx <hikeshang@hotmail.com> Suggested-by: Colin Adler <colin1adler@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Use parallel summation with native byte order per RFC 1071. add-with-carry operation is used to add 4 words per operation. Byteswap is performed before and after checksumming for compatibility with old `checksumNoFold()`. With this we get a 30-80% speedup in `checksum()` depending on packet sizes. Add unit tests with comparison to a per-word implementation. **Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4210R CPU @ 2.40GHz** | Size | OldTime | NewTime | Speedup | |------|---------|---------|----------| | 64 | 12.64 | 9.183 | 1.376456 | | 128 | 18.52 | 12.72 | 1.455975 | | 256 | 31.01 | 18.13 | 1.710425 | | 512 | 54.46 | 29.03 | 1.87599 | | 1024 | 102 | 52.2 | 1.954023 | | 1500 | 146.8 | 81.36 | 1.804326 | | 2048 | 196.9 | 102.5 | 1.920976 | | 4096 | 389.8 | 200.8 | 1.941235 | | 8192 | 767.3 | 413.3 | 1.856521 | | 9000 | 851.7 | 448.8 | 1.897727 | | 9001 | 854.8 | 451.9 | 1.891569 | **AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core Processor** | Size | OldTime | NewTime | Speedup | |------|---------|---------|----------| | 64 | 9.159 | 6.949 | 1.318031 | | 128 | 13.59 | 10.59 | 1.283286 | | 256 | 22.37 | 14.91 | 1.500335 | | 512 | 41.42 | 24.22 | 1.710157 | | 1024 | 81.59 | 45.05 | 1.811099 | | 1500 | 120.4 | 68.35 | 1.761522 | | 2048 | 162.8 | 90.14 | 1.806079 | | 4096 | 321.4 | 180.3 | 1.782585 | | 8192 | 650.4 | 360.8 | 1.802661 | | 9000 | 706.3 | 398.1 | 1.774177 | | 9001 | 712.4 | 398.2 | 1.789051 | Signed-off-by: Tu Dinh Ngoc <dinhngoc.tu@irit.fr> [Jason: simplified and cleaned up unit tests] Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: ruokeqx <ruokeqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
It should be POLLIN because closeFd is read-only file. Signed-off-by: Kurnia D Win <kurnia.d.win@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Reduce allocations by eliminating byte reader, hand-rolled decoding and
reusing message structs.
Synthetic benchmark:
var msgSink MessageInitiation
func BenchmarkMessageInitiationUnmarshal(b *testing.B) {
packet := make([]byte, MessageInitiationSize)
reader := bytes.NewReader(packet)
err := binary.Read(reader, binary.LittleEndian, &msgSink)
if err != nil {
b.Fatal(err)
}
b.Run("binary.Read", func(b *testing.B) {
b.ReportAllocs()
for range b.N {
reader := bytes.NewReader(packet)
_ = binary.Read(reader, binary.LittleEndian, &msgSink)
}
})
b.Run("unmarshal", func(b *testing.B) {
b.ReportAllocs()
for range b.N {
_ = msgSink.unmarshal(packet)
}
})
}
Results:
│ - │
│ sec/op │
MessageInitiationUnmarshal/binary.Read-8 1.508µ ± 2%
MessageInitiationUnmarshal/unmarshal-8 12.66n ± 2%
│ - │
│ B/op │
MessageInitiationUnmarshal/binary.Read-8 208.0 ± 0%
MessageInitiationUnmarshal/unmarshal-8 0.000 ± 0%
│ - │
│ allocs/op │
MessageInitiationUnmarshal/binary.Read-8 2.000 ± 0%
MessageInitiationUnmarshal/unmarshal-8 0.000 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Alexander Yastrebov <yastrebov.alex@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
This is already enforced in receive.go, but if these unmarshallers are to have error return values anyway, make them as explicit as possible. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
This pairs with the recent change in wireguard-tools. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Optimize message encoding by eliminating binary.Write (which internally uses reflection) in favour of hand-rolled encoding. This is companion to 9e7529c. Synthetic benchmark: var packetSink []byte func BenchmarkMessageInitiationMarshal(b *testing.B) { var msg MessageInitiation b.Run("binary.Write", func(b *testing.B) { b.ReportAllocs() for range b.N { var buf [MessageInitiationSize]byte writer := bytes.NewBuffer(buf[:0]) _ = binary.Write(writer, binary.LittleEndian, msg) packetSink = writer.Bytes() } }) b.Run("binary.Encode", func(b *testing.B) { b.ReportAllocs() for range b.N { packet := make([]byte, MessageInitiationSize) _, _ = binary.Encode(packet, binary.LittleEndian, msg) packetSink = packet } }) b.Run("marshal", func(b *testing.B) { b.ReportAllocs() for range b.N { packet := make([]byte, MessageInitiationSize) _ = msg.marshal(packet) packetSink = packet } }) } Results: │ - │ │ sec/op │ MessageInitiationMarshal/binary.Write-8 1.337µ ± 0% MessageInitiationMarshal/binary.Encode-8 1.242µ ± 0% MessageInitiationMarshal/marshal-8 53.05n ± 1% │ - │ │ B/op │ MessageInitiationMarshal/binary.Write-8 368.0 ± 0% MessageInitiationMarshal/binary.Encode-8 160.0 ± 0% MessageInitiationMarshal/marshal-8 160.0 ± 0% │ - │ │ allocs/op │ MessageInitiationMarshal/binary.Write-8 3.000 ± 0% MessageInitiationMarshal/binary.Encode-8 1.000 ± 0% MessageInitiationMarshal/marshal-8 1.000 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Alexander Yastrebov <yastrebov.alex@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Kernels below 5.12 are missing this:
commit 98184612aca0a9ee42b8eb0262a49900ee9eef0d
Author: Norman Maurer <norman_maurer@apple.com>
Date: Thu Apr 1 08:59:17 2021
net: udp: Add support for getsockopt(..., ..., UDP_GRO, ..., ...);
Support for UDP_GRO was added in the past but the implementation for
getsockopt was missed which did lead to an error when we tried to
retrieve the setting for UDP_GRO. This patch adds the missing switch
case for UDP_GRO
Fixes: e20cf8d3f1f7 ("udp: implement GRO for plain UDP sockets.")
Signed-off-by: Norman Maurer <norman_maurer@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
That means we can't set the option and then read it back later. Given
how buggy UDP_GRO is in general on odd kernels, just disable it on older
kernels all together.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.