Skip to content

fix(docs): correct grammatical errors and improve clarity in documentation#1416

Open
jbovet wants to merge 1 commit into
open-feature:mainfrom
jbovet:docs/fix-grammar-typos
Open

fix(docs): correct grammatical errors and improve clarity in documentation#1416
jbovet wants to merge 1 commit into
open-feature:mainfrom
jbovet:docs/fix-grammar-typos

Conversation

@jbovet

@jbovet jbovet commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR

  • Fixes grammar, spelling, and typos across the reference documentation, and corrects two broken code examples.

Related Issues

None. (No tracking issue — small documentation cleanup.)

Notes

  • Two of the changes are genuine code-example bugs (PHP :: static call, Python False), not just wording — the snippets would fail as previously written.

Follow-up Tasks

How to test

  • No functional testing needed — documentation only.
  • Optional: yarn build (Docusaurus) to confirm the MDX still compiles, and yarn lint:md for markdownlint.

…ation

Signed-off-by: Jose Bovet Derpich <jose.bovet@gmail.com>
@jbovet
jbovet requested review from a team as code owners July 22, 2026 23:10
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for openfeature ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b88c9ce
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/openfeature/deploys/6a614dcd92a13b00087617d9
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1416--openfeature.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes Run an agent on this branch

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3ae06e73-5a51-4835-9d01-4507c9974105

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd9a921 and b88c9ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • docs/reference/concepts/01-evaluation-api.mdx
  • docs/reference/concepts/02-provider.mdx
  • docs/reference/concepts/03-evaluation-context.mdx
  • docs/reference/concepts/04-hooks.mdx
  • docs/reference/concepts/05-events.mdx
  • docs/reference/concepts/06-sdk-paradigms.mdx
  • docs/reference/concepts/07-tracking.mdx
  • docs/reference/intro.mdx
  • docs/reference/sdks/client/web/react.mdx
  • docs/reference/sdks/server/cpp.mdx
  • docs/reference/sdks/server/ruby.mdx

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation wording, grammar, and code examples were corrected across evaluation concepts, provider guidance, event handling, context behavior, tracking, React SDK, C++, and Ruby reference pages.

Changes

Documentation reference updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Evaluation examples and context
docs/reference/concepts/01-evaluation-api.mdx, docs/reference/concepts/03-evaluation-context.mdx, docs/reference/concepts/04-hooks.mdx, docs/reference/intro.mdx
Evaluation examples use corrected language syntax and wording, including Python literals and PHP static method calls.
Events and context terminology
docs/reference/concepts/05-events.mdx, docs/reference/concepts/06-sdk-paradigms.mdx, docs/reference/concepts/07-tracking.mdx, docs/reference/sdks/client/web/react.mdx
Event comments, context reconciliation terminology, experimentation grammar, and React context wording were corrected.
Provider language examples
docs/reference/concepts/02-provider.mdx, docs/reference/sdks/server/cpp.mdx, docs/reference/sdks/server/ruby.mdx
Provider guidance and C++ and Ruby example comments were updated for wording and article grammar.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Suggested reviewers: toddbaert

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately summarizes the documentation cleanup and clarity fixes in the changeset.
Description check ✅ Passed The description matches the PR scope, mentioning grammar fixes and the two broken code examples.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant