-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
Added ParticleSpeciesNames.md #177
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
DavidSagan
wants to merge
8
commits into
openPMD:upcoming-1.1.0
from
DavidSagan:New-ParticleID-Standard
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b3090a7
Added ParticleSpeciesNames.md
DavidSagan c4635da
Update Draft of SpeciesType Extension
DavidSagan e0c830d
EXT SpeciesType: Reference in Std
ax3l d2fe642
EXT SpeciesType: Update
ax3l 9cb0d47
Remove Prefixes
ax3l 57fece3
Fix Typos
ax3l 0bb1615
Clarification Charge State
DavidSagan 6563438
Elementary Particles & Gauge+Higgs Bosons
ax3l File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ | ||
| Convention for Specifying Particle Species | ||
| ------------------------------------------ | ||
|
|
||
| This convention is for standardizing the names of particle species. | ||
|
|
||
| SubAtomic Particle Names | ||
| ---------------------------------- | ||
|
|
||
| - Subatomic particle names: | ||
| - antimuon | ||
| - antiproton | ||
| - bottom | ||
| - charm-antiquark | ||
| - charm-quark | ||
| - deuteron | ||
| - down-antiquark | ||
| - down-quark | ||
| - electron | ||
| - electron-neutrino | ||
| - gluon | ||
| - graviton | ||
| - higgs-boson | ||
| - muon | ||
| - muon-neutrino | ||
| - neutron | ||
| - photon | ||
| - pion | ||
| - positron | ||
| - proton | ||
| - strange-antiquark | ||
| - strange-quark | ||
| - tao-antiquark | ||
| - tao-quark | ||
| - tao-neutrino | ||
| - top-antiquark | ||
| - top-quark | ||
| - up-antiquark | ||
| - up-quark | ||
| - w-boson | ||
| - z-boson | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Names for Atoms and Molecules | ||
| ------------------- | ||
|
|
||
| - Atoms and molecules: Use standard chemical notation. Eg: "H20". Isotopes are denoted by a pound symbol "#" followed by the isotopic number followed by the chemical symbol. Eg: "#3He" for Helium-3. | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe that's a stupid question, but is there some kind of ISO naming already for this on which we can rely on?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked but I could not find anything unfortunately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, thanks for checking.
And something from PDG (the particle data group), maybe? Just that we don't miss something that already defines spellings.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(besides that insecurity of mine about accidentally re-inventing something, I like the proposed spellings)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had looked at the PDG as well without luck.