Change definition of path comparability#160
Closed
Mats-SX wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
The direction in which a relationship is traversed is not significant for a path. The mention of this in the CIP was caused by a misunderstanding.
|
How can the direction not be important? If the direction is not important that would make |
There is lots of confusion around how self-relationships (or loops) are matched by patterns. These scenarios aim to outline how this is supposed to work, and how it differs from simple relationship matching.
Mats-SX
force-pushed
the
path-equality
branch
from
60bf305 to
2998149
Compare
Mats-SX
force-pushed
the
path-equality
branch
from
2998149 to
0f31400
Compare
Mats-SX
force-pushed
the
path-equality
branch
from
0f31400 to
2998149
Compare
Author
|
Replaced by #162 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The direction in which a relationship is traversed is
not significant for a path. The mention of this in the CIP
was caused by a misunderstanding.