Skip to content

OCPEDGE-2722: Release 4.18.5#2548

Open
pacevedom wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift:release-managementfrom
pacevedom:OCPEDGE-2722
Open

OCPEDGE-2722: Release 4.18.5#2548
pacevedom wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift:release-managementfrom
pacevedom:OCPEDGE-2722

Conversation

@pacevedom

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pacevedom: This pull request references OCPEDGE-2722 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@pacevedom

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/hold

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 33a829c5-c4b0-467f-9e46-3e9e55af8403

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 5, 2026
@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from Neilhamza and jerpeter1 June 5, 2026 07:51
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pacevedom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 5, 2026
@mmakwana30

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 5, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 17, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@bjahagir-OpenShift

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/lgtm /doc-approved

@kasturinarra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/zstream-4.14-images ci/prow/zstream-4.16-images ci/prow/zstream-4.18-images ci/prow/zstream-4.19-images ci/prow/zstream-4.20-images ci/prow/zstream-4.21-images

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kasturinarra: Overrode contexts on behalf of kasturinarra: ci/prow/zstream-4.14-images, ci/prow/zstream-4.16-images, ci/prow/zstream-4.18-images, ci/prow/zstream-4.19-images, ci/prow/zstream-4.20-images, ci/prow/zstream-4.21-images

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/zstream-4.14-images ci/prow/zstream-4.16-images ci/prow/zstream-4.18-images ci/prow/zstream-4.19-images ci/prow/zstream-4.20-images ci/prow/zstream-4.21-images

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@kasturinarra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-mno-arm-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-mno-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-sno-arm-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-baremetalds-mno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-baremetalds-sno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kasturinarra: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-mno-arm-qe-integration-tests
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-mno-qe-integration-tests
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-sno-arm-qe-integration-tests
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-baremetalds-mno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-baremetalds-sno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • CodeRabbit
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/release-dry-run
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.14-images
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.16-images
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-mno-arm-qe-integration-tests
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-mno-qe-integration-tests
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-arm-qe-integration-tests
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-baremetalds-mno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-baremetalds-sno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.18-images
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.19-images
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.20-images
  • ci/prow/zstream-4.21-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-release-dry-run
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.14-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.16-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-mno-arm-qe-integration-tests
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-mno-qe-integration-tests
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-arm-qe-integration-tests
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.18-e2e-baremetalds-mno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.18-e2e-baremetalds-sno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.18-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.19-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.20-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-lvm-operator-release-management-zstream-4.21-images
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-mno-arm-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-mno-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-sno-arm-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-baremetalds-mno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.16-e2e-baremetalds-sno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@kasturinarra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-mno-arm-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-mno-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-arm-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-baremetalds-mno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-baremetalds-sno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kasturinarra: Overrode contexts on behalf of kasturinarra: ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-mno-arm-qe-integration-tests, ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-mno-qe-integration-tests, ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-arm-qe-integration-tests, ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests, ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-baremetalds-mno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests, ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-baremetalds-sno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-mno-arm-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-mno-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-arm-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-baremetalds-mno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-baremetalds-sno-dualstack-qe-integration-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@suleymanakbas91

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label docs-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR label Jul 15, 2026
@kasturinarra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-arm-qe-integration-tests

@kasturinarra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test zstream-4.14-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests

@kasturinarra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests

@kasturinarra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/zstream-4.14-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kasturinarra: Overrode contexts on behalf of kasturinarra: ci/prow/zstream-4.14-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests, ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/zstream-4.14-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests ci/prow/zstream-4.18-e2e-aws-sno-qe-integration-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pacevedom: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mmakwana30

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Jul 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants