Disable rhel autoconnections on bootif r9

[rvykydal]

Resolves: RHEL-78272
Port of #6138

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request adds a new systemd service, anaconda-nm-disable-autocons-rhel.service, to disable NetworkManager autoconnections specifically on RHEL systems during the anaconda installer process. This mirrors functionality already present for other systems, now tailored for RHEL.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added a new systemd service to disable NetworkManager autoconnections on RHEL systems.	Added a new systemd service file. Added the new service to the list of installed systemd services.	data/systemd/Makefile.am data/systemd/anaconda-nm-disable-autocons-rhel.service

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[rvykydal]

/kickstart-test --testtype smoke

[rvykydal]

/kickstart-test network-autoconnections-httpks

[rvykydal]

The patches were cleaned up and squashed in #6258, I'll open new pull request for rhel-9 branch.

[rvykydal]

The patches were cleaned up and squashed in #6258, I'll open new pull request for rhel-9 branch.

Ah, that was meant for another PR, sorry.

[rvykydal]

/kickstart-test --testtype smoke

[rvykydal]

/kickstart-test network-autoconnections-httpks

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @rvykydal - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider including a brief explanation of why this change is necessary.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[jkonecny12]

Looks good to me, however, aren't we missing

ConditionOSRelease=ID=rhel

on the systemd unit. Or is this condition missing no RHEL-9?

[rvykydal]

Looks good to me, however, aren't we missing

ConditionOSRelease=ID=rhel

on the systemd unit. Or is this condition missing no RHEL-9?

It wouldn't work for centos so for rhel-9 I'd keep it as it is. For upstream / RHEL10 we'll be adding this: #6142 in scope of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-67815. But since we are using special rhel branches there is actually no need for the patch in rhel-9 (and in rhel-10 neither but I think we should be consistent with upstream there - at least to keep it working, given we can't count on ELN much in that).