Skip to content

docs: Component method display - #270

Merged
alexkaduk merged 2 commits into
developmentfrom
docs/component-methods
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

docs: Component method display#270
alexkaduk merged 2 commits into
developmentfrom
docs/component-methods

Conversation

@lzeiml

@lzeiml lzeiml commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Internal ticket: 67

Core PR: siemens/ix#2652

Small adjustment to ensure the component methods get displayed correctly.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved the formatting and styling of API function descriptions and parameter details.
    • Enhanced presentation of optional parameter labels, types, and default values.
    • Preserved the existing API signature content and behavior.

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for industrial-experience ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d022f4e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/industrial-experience/deploys/6a7b020aa3234c0008cac73f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-270--industrial-experience.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes Run an agent on this branch

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 7325065d-50c9-481f-8b67-95230d5af9cc

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

ApiFunction preserves its signature output while restructuring description and parameter-row JSX with explicit styling wrappers, decoded type/default values, updated class composition, and a less constrained returns cell.

Changes

ApiFunction rendering

Layer / File(s) Summary
Restructure signature and table rendering
src/components/ApiTable/ApiFunction.tsx
Reformats signature construction, restructures description and parameter rows with styled labels and conditional optional/default markup, removes the returns-cell width constraint, and retains the default export identity.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the documentation change that fixes component method display.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/component-methods

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@src/components/ApiTable/ApiFunction.tsx`:
- Around line 99-106: Update the default-value conditional in ApiFunction’s
parameter rendering to check whether param.defaultValue is undefined rather than
relying on truthiness, so explicitly empty strings still render the Default row
while omitted values remain hidden.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 83d71742-947b-4cce-b4c4-4ace26e91240

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f44ce1 and 1f66d08.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/ApiTable/ApiFunction.tsx

Comment thread src/components/ApiTable/ApiFunction.tsx
@alexkaduk
alexkaduk requested a review from a team as a code owner August 11, 2026 10:30
@alexkaduk
alexkaduk self-requested a review August 11, 2026 10:30
@lzeiml
lzeiml changed the base branch from main to development August 11, 2026 10:43
@lzeiml
lzeiml force-pushed the docs/component-methods branch 2 times, most recently from e49a7b9 to a54673a Compare August 11, 2026 10:59
@lzeiml
lzeiml force-pushed the docs/component-methods branch from 690b858 to d022f4e Compare August 11, 2026 11:05
@alexkaduk
alexkaduk merged commit d7cd272 into development Aug 11, 2026
6 checks passed
@alexkaduk
alexkaduk deleted the docs/component-methods branch August 11, 2026 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants