Skip to content

Add Future.Travel to Blixt#391

Open
FutureTravelATM wants to merge 2 commits intosmolcars:masterfrom
FutureTravelATM:master
Open

Add Future.Travel to Blixt#391
FutureTravelATM wants to merge 2 commits intosmolcars:masterfrom
FutureTravelATM:master

Conversation

@FutureTravelATM
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Add Future.Travel to Blixt

Add Future.Travel to Blixt
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Nov 1, 2021

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/hsjoberg/blixt-wallet/o6HinwEAUAZouJ13YJxn42HYFKqD
✅ Preview: https://blixt-wallet-git-fork-futuretravelatm-master-hsjoberg.vercel.app

@hsjoberg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

hsjoberg commented Nov 5, 2021

Thank you for your pull request @FutureTravelATM.
I think the code looks great!

I have a concern regarding image itself, as can be observed via the Vercel preview, the text in the image is too small to be readable.
Would it be possible just use FutureTravel's logotype instead and skip the text?

@FutureTravelATM
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

FutureTravelATM commented Nov 5, 2021 via email

@FutureTravelATM
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

FutureTravelATM commented Nov 5, 2021 via email

New logo with the white circle. Its size is still 400 x 400 px.
@hsjoberg hsjoberg force-pushed the master branch 3 times, most recently from 35daec7 to 51ec3e4 Compare December 31, 2021 16:28
@hsjoberg hsjoberg force-pushed the master branch 9 times, most recently from ecc4b42 to 91833d0 Compare March 28, 2022 15:41
@hsjoberg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi @FutureTravelATM, I don't think the logo looks visually pleasing because of the space constraints we're dealing with here in the transaction log.
I still suggest to cut out the text considering the name will be shown just to right of the image.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants