-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 676
chore: add lint pre-commit hook #6697
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
pkey
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
feat/add-pre-commit-hook
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+22
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ set -exuo pipefail | |
|
|
||
| # requires https://brew.sh/ | ||
| brew bundle --file=$(dirname "$0")/Brewfile | ||
|
|
||
| pre-commit install | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion: Nice idea! did you intentionally not use
npm run format?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only worry I have is performance/latency it adds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@PeterSchafer yeah I originally had
npm run lintwhich I believe covers formatting and is also what we run in thecode-analysisjob. The issue with that is that it will run the linter/formatter on all the files every time.This approach limits it only to what has changed before committing. Performance wise, we can't go any further I believe.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Locally on my 32GB M1 the whole
npm run lintruns in 7s - so that's the absolute worst case scenario.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess the latency is not exactly linear (1 file still takes 2.5s) but still worth it IMO given that this can easily be 20+ minutes before you find out you have a linter error in the CI.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think running the same commands as in the
code-analysisstep should suffice. i.e.npm run lint&make lint.I agree that the ~15seconds it takes to run the pre-commit linting is better than waiting for the CI job to fail
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
okay let's run an experiment. when it gets too long, we can still change it!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@j-luong so would you prefer the full
npm run lintcommand or this version? This version I believe covers everything though if you would change whatnpm run lintdoes it would fall through the cracks.